avatar_leptiprince

F-16 Dérivatives

Started by leptiprince, July 09, 2014, 02:06:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

scooter

Looks like a reboot BSG Viper Mk. 7
The F-106- 26 December 1956 to 8 August 1988
Gone But Not Forgotten

QuoteOh are you from Wales ?? Do you know a fella named Jonah ?? He used to live in whales for a while.
— Groucho Marx

My dA page: Scooternjng

Tophe

did not know this Science Fiction bird but Google shows it, thanks.
https://snubfighter.fandom.com/wiki/Viper_MK_7
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Mossie

I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

Tophe

thanks Mossie!

Quote from: perttime on May 17, 2023, 06:05:48 AMButbutbut....
Making something so small out of an XL leaves a lot of unused pieces. Maybe something can be created out of those?
Ahem, I see nothing possible clearly, as the best parts are removed: :unsure:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

perttime

It does need a nose - or at least a cockpit (if it has a pilot).  :wacko:




Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

perttime


Tophe

Quote from: perttime on May 24, 2023, 11:22:15 PMXF-16AR makes me think of the Boeing X-32 Joint Strike Fighter candidate.
Thanks, not pretty but new... :-\  ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

thundereagle1997

Sorry the retractable ski undercarriage isn't the intake you're think of. The primary intakes  are actually  behind the ride control vanes which are the large triangle  & the intake ducts which prevent dust sand grass ice snow lava dirt etc via opening & closing to prevent said debris into the intake similar to the MiG-29 is the large square behind that triangle I just described to you & the other square containing  the 2 smaller triangles those are the primary intakes. If you can see the link I sent to you which is here
 ( https://www.deviantart.com/armoredryukenshi1984/art/F-53-Swordsdragon-view-N-A-954541956 ) you can see the diagram of the original F-53 & on the diagram you can see that the diagrams on both aircraft are the same ( except for the retractable ski undercarriage of the naval version which you took a photo of ). Before any one else asks yes the F-53 Swordsdragon (land & naval) has 2 vertical tails rather a single vertical tail which is designed to operate at higher angles of attack than a single vertical tail like the F-16.

Tophe

Quote from: thundereagle1997 on May 25, 2023, 10:43:53 PMSorry the retractable ski undercarriage isn't the intake you're think of.
No, I am not an engineer, i am a dreamer. Let me dream. ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Tophe on May 25, 2023, 10:48:40 PM
Quote from: thundereagle1997 on May 25, 2023, 10:43:53 PMSorry the retractable ski undercarriage isn't the intake you're think of.

No, I am not an engineer, i am a dreamer. Let me dream. ;)


 :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

Thanks!

Like the F-16XL was an extended 16A, the F-16TDF was an extended 16XL: <_<
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]