avatar_TomZ

Spitsair & Corfire

Started by TomZ, January 18, 2024, 10:23:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TomZ

I'm afraid I got my kit parts mixed up again. The fit was somehow a bit off.....



















Models: Hobbycraft & Airfix 1/48

TomZ
Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

HarryPhishnuts


PR19_Kit

Hm, yes. I can't say that cranked wings work too well on a Spitfire.

Elliptical wings on a Corsiar however, NOW you're talking.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

chrisonord

The dogs philosophy on life.
If you cant eat it hump it or fight it,
Pee on it and walk away!!

The Rat

"My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives." Hedley Lamarr, Blazing Saddles

Life is too short to worry about perfection

Youtube: https://tinyurl.com/46dpfdpr

royabulgaf

The Spit looks great.  The Spit wings on the Corsair give it a Brewsterish look.
The Leng Plateau is lovely this time of year

Wardukw

That Corfire looks just beautiful..that's prefect Tom  ;D
The Spitsair looks carrier broune for certain..love that too  ;D  😉
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

Dizzyfugu

Quote from: PR19_Kit on January 18, 2024, 12:38:33 PMElliptical wings on a Corsiar however, NOW you're talking.  :thumbsup:

I have something similar on my agenda, too, as a land-based F4U derivative, yet with P-47 wings and landing gear, because I think that the parts' size will be a better match for the quite bulky Corsair.

zenrat

Verr good, but you missed the opportunity to put a huuuuger diameter prop on the Spit.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Old Wombat

The Spitsair is under-powered & the Corfire has far to high a wing loading BUT ,,, !


They both look bloody good! :thumbsup:  ;D
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

SPINNERS

I love them both but prefer the top one!

Vulcan7

Beautiful builds, glad you've joined the (Spitfire) elliptical wings on everything club  :mellow:  :mellow:  :mellow:  :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:  :thumbsup:
"My grandad fought in WW1 and used to make Mosquito wings in WW2"

perttime

Quote from: zenrat on January 19, 2024, 01:43:27 AMVerr good, but you missed the opportunity to put a huuuuger diameter prop on the Spit.
;D  Either that, or give it an even shorter landing gear?

Doug K

Quote from: PR19_Kit on January 18, 2024, 12:38:33 PMHm, yes. I can't say that cranked wings work too well on a Spitfire.

Elliptical wings on a Corsiar however, NOW you're talking.  :thumbsup:


Wasn't there an inverted gull-wing proposed for a Supermarine naval fighter in the late 30s?

NARSES2

Quote from: Doug K on January 19, 2024, 04:10:06 AMWasn't there an inverted gull-wing proposed for a Supermarine naval fighter in the late 30s?

Supermarine Type 224 was designed as a replacement for the Gauntlet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Type_224

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.