It's visible there for me, WELL OTT of course.

Yep I can see the pics ..Chris one of these lads should be able to copy them to here I hope 😀 👍

Best pic I saw:

You cannot view this attachment.

Interesting. Even though I do not get any SW vibes yet, rather early Seventies James Bond?

It's more Mandalorian than Star Wars (by which I mean Episodes iv to vi).  Good build though.

That certainly is different - but still works and looks believable.

The replacement canopy is something I wouldn't have thought of.

And I like the idea of a strip over the rivets - so much easier than sanding. 

A disturbingly conclusive travesty, found at War Thunder:



More here: https://live.warthunder.com/post/1101853/en/

I actually like that a lot, even though I'd rather give it some 'Winders! 

It actually does look good 

Maybe XF-90?

Quote from: MiB on April 02, 2024, 02:02:16 AMMaybe XF-90?

The author dubbed it F-97.

Quote from: NARSES2 on April 02, 2024, 12:31:10 AMIt actually does look good 

It does!

Better than the Swift ever looked in RAF service. And the Fireflashes do look a trifle incongruous.

Blimey, that's a looker! 

A couple of AIM-9Bs, for certain.

Would it have been able to tote a couple of Falcons, too?

Quote from: PR19_Kit on April 02, 2024, 02:17:39 AMBetter than the Swift ever looked in RAF service. And the Fireflashes do look a trifle incongruous.

Agree with the first part, but I quite like the Fireflashes. Maybe the Royal Navy won the Battle of the Capes ? 

Another War Thunder find - this time a very close/"truthful" copy of my relatively recent Uruguayan Skyhawk, which is actually an A-4H and not an -E. Lacks credits, though. It even seems to carry that wrongly-colored hog mouth (originally taken from an A-10 in desert cammo  ) Best thing is the "semi-historical" label. What ever this is supposed to mean, esp. for a totally fictional livery?



More here: https://live.warthunder.com/post/1101983/en/