Loong ago I had started to build a BV-141 L:
https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=45618.msg819164#msg819164

but then I had used the part-built model for the BV-282:
https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=49628.msg935381#msg935381

Now I am starting again, with a "new" kit, in order to build at last a BV-141 L.



A problem will be trying to remember how I had cut and reassembled the wings.
AND, I will modify the cockpit, NO greenhouse, something more streamlined, maybe for a racer...

Oh, that sounds great!

Starting to assemble the main sub-assemblies for the BV 141, I realized that it could also offer possibilities as a raid/long-distance-record plane. 
You cannot view this attachment.
But this would not be a Tophesque solution.
So, apart from changing the nacelle/fuselage position, I thought I could - slightly - modify the nacelle for a racer.
An entry for the Pan-European Free-for-All Pylon Championship, where the asymmetric structure would undeniably offer many advantages.
The nacelle was studied according to the theories of the famous austro-hungarian aerodynamicist Otto von Krapfen, who favoured a beaver-tail  tail.
You cannot view this attachment.
You cannot view this attachment.
But the construction was for the moment stalled by a controversy with some of the younger engineers that expounded the advantages of a shovel-nose form.
You cannot view this attachment.
While the debate goes on,  work is advancing on removing all rivets, an obvious necessity for a racer.

p.s.: I tried for the first time the "click or drag" system for attaching photos, instead of postimages, but it leaves a lot of space between photos, or between photo and text, even if I had not left any space.

Modifying that cockpit nacelle is fun, isn't it? (For certain highly specialized uses of the word 'fun'...)

a quite creative debate !

Oh my you've set yer self up for some hard work

Mog
>^-.-^<

That's kinda like what I've done with the Shinden..yours is just alot more work  but still very doable 
This will be very unique and I like that 😀

The engineers of the "new school" won the controversy with Otto von Krapfen 's followers, as they could demonstrate that their solution had a better obstreperousness factor expressed in Tophe units Th, as defined by the formula:
1 − 4λ2a2 sin4 ( hk2)(1 − λ2a2) (a(cj+1 + cj ) − λa2(cj+1 − cj ))/∂tu(x, t) + a(u)∂xu(x, t) = Th

so the shape the BV 141 L is taking is this:

Quote from: loupgarou on July 20, 2024, 01:24:09 AMThe engineers of the "new school" won the controversy with Otto von Krapfen 's followers, as they could demonstrate that their solution had a better obstreperousness factor expressed in Tophe units Th, as defined by the formula:
1 − 4λ2a2 sin4 ( hk2)(1 − λ2a2) (a(cj+1 + cj ) − λa2(cj+1 − cj ))/∂tu(x, t) + a(u)∂xu(x, t) = Th

Can you show your working please...

Is that in Metric or Imperial units?   

Quote from: PR19_Kit on July 20, 2024, 05:34:02 AMIs that in Metric or Imperial units?   

Given the late, great Tophe's nationality  I would assume it's a metric measurement.  To convert to Imperial equivalent, multiply by approximately 9. 5954395  and subtract from your answer 17 (or any other two digit  prime number of your choice.)

Quote from: Rheged on July 20, 2024, 07:05:38 AM

Quote from: PR19_Kit on July 20, 2024, 05:34:02 AMIs that in Metric or Imperial units?   

Given the late, great Tophe's nationality  I would assume it's a metric measurement.  To convert to Imperial equivalent, multiply by approximately 9. 5954395  and subtract from your answer 17 (or any other two digit  prime number of your choice.)

Exactly !

    

😁😁😁😁

This is cool! Keep it coming!