Why my mind continues to read the title of this topic as "SHARK on skis" ? 

Looking forward to this one. The Shack will look great with skis attached.

Quote from: loupgarou on November 19, 2024, 01:06:54 PMWhy my mind continues to read the title of this topic as "SHARK on skis" ? 

Mine keeps going towards an ice fishing shack on skis

Quote from: scooter on November 19, 2024, 01:37:47 PM

Quote from: loupgarou on November 19, 2024, 01:06:54 PMWhy my mind continues to read the title of this topic as "SHARK on skis" ? 

Mine keeps going towards an ice fishing shack on skis

You mean using the hole ment for the retractable radar and having a dipping sonar similar to those used on helicopters.

Quote from: McColm on November 19, 2024, 03:56:26 PM

Quote from: scooter on November 19, 2024, 01:37:47 PM

Quote from: loupgarou on November 19, 2024, 01:06:54 PMWhy my mind continues to read the title of this topic as "SHARK on skis" ? 

Mine keeps going towards an ice fishing shack on skis

You mean using the hole ment for the retractable radar and having a dipping sonar similar to those used on helicopters.

No, this is what I mean

A literal ice fishing shack

I'm going with C-130 but the Shack will look cool.

I'll admit..seeing a Sharc on ice would impress me more than a C-130 ...we've all seen the 130 on ice .

I went looking for pics of a C-133 on skis.  I was convinced i'd find some.
I was wrong dammit.   

Okay, let me clarify.  I am asking about on sea ice, on top of ocean, not land covered by ice.  The weight issue is different there.

In any case I would enjoy seeing big planes on skies!

And the big planes quoted were landing on prepared ice strips.
In this case it's landing on an unprepared ice field.
I suppose the first important thing to know is the ice thickness, BEFORE attempting a landing.
Are there instruments able to measure this from the air, flying at xxx knots?

Quote from: zenrat on Yesterday at 02:07:44 AMI went looking for pics of a C-133 on skis.  I was convinced i'd find some.
I was wrong dammit.   

The C-133 sits VERY close to the ground.  No room for skis, but the gear doors almost look like skis.

Quote from: loupgarou on Yesterday at 01:01:26 PMAnd the big planes quoted were landing on prepared ice strips.
In this case it's landing on an unprepared ice field.
I suppose the first important thing to know is the ice thickness, BEFORE attempting a landing.
Are there instruments able to measure this from the air, flying at xxx knots?

Lou the only way to test the ice thickness is usually with a team who land in a very small plane and drill a hole ...if it's an area where there's a base camp..be it from ship or by land ..same deal ..drill a hole if it's over water ...on land it's much easier to deal with ..lie on land is hard pack ya just have to make super it's not over permafrost..then things can get tricky .
Still tho..drill a hole with a auger bit and check it out .

I guess we're stuck calling it Shark or Sharklton now lol

Unboxing.

Well looks like the decals have seen better days.  The decals are the same vintage as me- 1967 boxing.....



The Shackleton has been jokingly referred to as "100,000 rivets flying in close formation" and it likes they die makers at Frog got every one of them into the mold!

Now to get the parts to line up so you don't have to sand them all off!