World War One Whifs

Started by stevehed, April 10, 2015, 12:07:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

zenrat

What would the RFC have used as a British equivalent of lozenge patterns?
Tartan?  Burberry Check?  a William Morris design?
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

kerick

Quote from: zenrat on April 15, 2025, 05:42:33 AMWhat would the RFC have used as a British equivalent of lozenge patterns?
Tartan?  Burberry Check?  a William Morris design?

Dazzle!
" Somewhere, between half true, and completely crazy, is a rainbow of nice colours "
Tophe the Wise

stevehed

Interesting but what colours? Brown and green but not much dazzle. Tartan looks promising.

Wardukw

Yellow ..red..blue and orange checkers  :wacko:
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

NARSES2

Quote from: stevehed on April 15, 2025, 04:03:37 PMTartan looks promising.

Especially some of the more subtle ones. Perhaps a Royal Stewart one, although it's a tad vibrant.  :rolleyes:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Mossie

Gingham.  :angel:

Paisley, wouldn't so much dazzle as blind...  :wacko:
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

NARSES2

Quote from: Mossie on April 19, 2025, 02:23:43 PMGingham.  :angel:

Paisley, wouldn't so much dazzle as blind...  :wacko:

 ;D  ;D

Prince of Wales Check ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

RAFF-35

Can I ask, is this a general place to dump WW1 whifs or is it a gallery for your builds, Steve?  :lol:
Don't let ageing get you down, it's too hard to get back up

zenrat

Quote from: RAFF-35 on Yesterday at 05:21:02 AMCan I ask, is this a general place to dump WW1 whifs or is it a gallery for your builds, Steve?  :lol:

Currently it's a discussion on fabric patterns in the early 20th century... :mellow:
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Mossie

Quote from: zenrat on Yesterday at 06:21:41 AM
Quote from: RAFF-35 on Yesterday at 05:21:02 AMCan I ask, is this a general place to dump WW1 whifs or is it a gallery for your builds, Steve?  :lol:

Currently it's a discussion on fabric patterns in the early 20th century... :mellow:

And further fuelling the thread hijack:

The British did some experiments with cammouflage patterns. A Canadian artist, Percyval Tudor-Hart was commissioned to do some experiments. He came up with a zig-zag dazzle pattern. This model shows the pattern, but the full scale experiments were done using fabric drapes. Some camouflage gloves were produced, as well some experiments with ships and I believe he did some experiments with aircraft, but I've never found anything. There's more in the links.
https://www.reddit.com/r/camouflage/comments/1egs0tj/does_anyone_have_more_info_on_this_camouflage/?rdt=41073

https://camoupedia.blogspot.com/2019/05/percyval-tudor-hart-canadian-camouflage.html?m=1

You cannot view this attachment.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

PR19_Kit

That's difficult just too look at in model form!  :-\
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Mossie

Here's the full scale version. I did consider building it in 1/72 using plastic card and printed decals but decided against it.

You cannot view this attachment.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

PR19_Kit

Ye gods, that must have looked a sight in full colour!  :o

But surely it's hardly 'camouflaged' as such, is it?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Mossie

When I first found out about this experiment, I assumed the pattern was designed to dazzle and confuse the eye. According to the second link, it was to mix the colours to appear grey to the eye.

It wasn't adopted and the optical mixing doesn't work as Tudor-Hart expected. Many of the early camouflage experts were artists and didn't have a full understanding of the science behind colour. Solomon J Solomon, who designed the camouflage that was adopted on the Mark I tanks, got the patterning right. However, the bright colours he used were often overpainted in the field with dull natural tones.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.