I have started with a new concept to push the 163 one step forward . 
At 1946 it was converted into a two engine jet fighter !

You cannot view this attachment.

You cannot view this attachment.




 

But wouldn't that make it twice as dangerous as the 163? 

More Speed .
More Range.
More weapons
I think this could fly supersonic ? 

But would the pilot survive the landing? 

I am liking where this is going, and shall be watching with interest.

Jets instead of rocket power is one way to help the pilot stay alive....im liking this   

    Interesting!!

So...

...undercarriage?  or two more skids under the wing engines?

And will it retain the rocket motor?

Quote from: zenrat on April 19, 2025, 04:38:13 AMSo...

...undercarriage?  or two more skids under the wing engines?

And will it retain the rocket motor?

Rocket motor for climb to altitude and then switch to the jets for the attack on the bomber stream and return to base. If it retains the skid landing gear maybe they found a sloution whereby they could flood the fuel tanks with something to stop any remaining rocket fuel going "BOOM" on landing ?

No, the rocket engine is not on board anymore , i have closed the tail   

More space for fuel.

Here is the new tail...

You cannot view this attachment.

Quote from: PR19_Kit on April 18, 2025, 02:40:15 PMBut wouldn't that make it twice as dangerous as the 163? 

Well no T-Stoff/C-Stoff as fuel, so less chance to go boom, but an engine out may get the pilots attention!

Love it! 

The biggest parts are together, i like the complete look 

You cannot view this attachment.

You cannot view this attachment.

You cannot view this attachment.

I like where this is going.


It's got ne thinking of a Luft 46 combo of rocket for climb and pulse jet for sustained flight.