avatar_puddingwrestler

Rules question...

Started by puddingwrestler, January 22, 2009, 10:04:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

puddingwrestler

I assume that entries into this GB must have rotors. I ask because I want to know if I can make something like the police gunships from G-Police.


It's helicopter shaped, behaves a lot like one, but is driven by gimbaled thruster pods. I was thinking about building something like that outof a Eurocopter Tiger (cause I have one!)
There are no good kits, bad kits or grail kits, just kitbash fodder.

puddingwrestler

There are no good kits, bad kits or grail kits, just kitbash fodder.

Weaver

Well it's not my decision, but I would guess not: it's more of a vectored thrust vehicle than a helicopter/autogyro/gyroplane type craft, as far as I can tell.....

As a rough suggestion, I would venture that a rotary-winged aircraft is one where the overwhelming majority of the air which lifts the craft is NOT heated by having fuel burnt in it. Thus a tilting ducted fan is as eligible as a conventional helicopter, but a tilting turbojet or turbofan isn't. Of course, this opens the question of tilt-rotors/tilt-fans whose engines are co-located with them (such as the V-22) whose exhausts point downwards when hovering. The solution here is one of proportion: in the V-22, the vast majority of the engine's power is absorbed by the rotor, and the exhaust contributes only a tiny percentage of thrust. With a tilting turbofan, on the other hand, a significant proportion of the thrust comes from the core.

Again, just my thoughts and not my decision......
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

anthonyp

Been meaning to address this, just keep forgetting.

Yeah, Weaver pretty much hit it on the head.  Put blades on it, and it's acceptable (heck, even folding blades for once it's airborne), but in it's current form, it's not eligible.
I exist to pi$$ others off!!!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man

jcf

So tilt-duct machines like the DOAK 16, X-22 and Nord 500 would be eligible?
http://prototypes.free.fr/vtol/vtol-7.htm


DOAK 16


Nord 500

Jon


puddingwrestler

Fair enough, that's basically what I was expecting. Just thought I'd throw it out there and see.
Now to think of something else to do...
There are no good kits, bad kits or grail kits, just kitbash fodder.

Mossie

Don't let that stop you building it, Pudding!  The G-Police games are a good source of inspiration, the Havoc & Venom gunships being particularly do-able.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

anthonyp

Yeah, if you could mod them into ducted fans, that'd work too!

Yeah, Jon, ducted fans are welcome in this one!  They got props that some sane person put guards around  ;D
I exist to pi$$ others off!!!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man

nev

#8
Quote from: anthonyp on January 27, 2009, 06:53:11 AM
Been meaning to address this, just keep forgetting.

Yeah, Weaver pretty much hit it on the head.  Put blades on it, and it's acceptable (heck, even folding blades for once it's airborne), but in it's current form, it's not eligible.

So, uh, does that mean the V-22 is eligable or not? :confused:

Edit:  nevermind, Antonys 1st post in the main thread says they are in!  :drink:
Between almost-true and completely-crazy, there is a rainbow of nice shades - Tophe


Sales of Airfix kits plummeted in the 1980s, and GCSEs had to be made easier as a result - James May

Weaver

Quote from: nev on February 04, 2009, 10:09:07 AM
Quote from: anthonyp on January 27, 2009, 06:53:11 AM
Been meaning to address this, just keep forgetting.

Yeah, Weaver pretty much hit it on the head.  Put blades on it, and it's acceptable (heck, even folding blades for once it's airborne), but in it's current form, it's not eligible.

So, uh, does that mean the V-22 is eligable or not? :confused:

Edit:  nevermind, Antonys 1st post in the main thread says they are in!  :drink:

V-22 is in because the thrust from the exhausts when hovering is a negligible part of the total thrust.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones