avatar_Spey_Phantom

random idea: the "Navalise it" GB

Started by Spey_Phantom, June 12, 2009, 08:04:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Daryl J.

How about a P-47N navalized and retuned for low altitude ground attack.   Korea?  Vietnam?




Mossie

How about a T-45E, a Hawk 100 with T-45 style naval mods & a Hawk 200 radar nose?  A T-45D is underway, a T-45C with synthetic apeture radar to provide closer training capability to the Super Bug.  There are talks for the USN to purchase more Hawks, I assume these would be to the latest 100 series specs with the radar included?
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

Sauragnmon

I know what I have in mind for this GB when she kicks off, I've got a Viper that's been sitting in my stash, and I did plan to put her in Alt Sundowner markings, so the thought of fitting her with hook and cat bar wouldn't be too much more over the mods I have in mind for it. 
Putty-fu, Scratch-jutsu and Bash-chi, the sacred martial arts of the What-If. Mastering them, is Ancient Chinese Secret.

Just your friendly neighbourhood Mad Scientist and Ship-whiffer.

Overkill? Nah, it's Insurance.  So are the 20" guns.

elmayerle

Well, I've got a T-45 kit as well as the Neomega hawk 200 conversion; seems like a FT-45 (or AT-45) may be in the future.
"Reality is the leading cause of stress amongst those in touch with it."
--Jane Wagner and Lily Tomlin

Joe C-P

Please do it; I've proposed the USN filling out the big decks with fully-capable Goshawks, but haven't found the right models.
In want of hobby space!  The kitchen table is never stable.  Still managing to get some building done.

Brian da Basher

#50
We've only got a few days until the proposed Nov. 1st start for this GB. To get it off the ground, we need rules and a moderator otherwise this one may fall by the wayside.

Time for your input, guys.
:cheers:
Brian da Basher

Brian da Basher

#51
Ok we've got a moderator (thanks, ysi_maniac !) and some proposed rules:

1. GB runs from November 1 2009 to February 1, 2010
2. Entries will be What-if based in a broad concept of navalization of something that was not intended to be navalized:
       Land based planes converted to carrier based version
       Land based planes converted to float planes
       Amphibian versons of land vehicles
       of course, the original land based thing can be a whif too
3. Eligible entries must be a What-If, not posted on other GB, and posted to the Completed Entries thread by the deadline.
4. Winners will be determined by votes from forum members. Prizes will be awarded.
5. All decisions of the GB Moderator(s) are final.
6. There is no Rule #6.
7. Have Fun!

Unfortunately, any discussion on the rules will be a bit limited as this GB starts in three days! Yikes!
:o :o
Brian da Basher

ysi_maniac

I would like to add a line to the second rule:
"anything you think that falls into a broad concept of navalization" :thumbsup:
Will die without understanding this world.

PanzerWulff

OK it's the first so Wheres the Build!!! :blink: :blink: :blink: I'm ready to go with a USN/USMC Beaufighter
"Panzer"
Chris"PanzerWulff"Gray "The Whiffing Fool"
NOTE TO SELF Stick to ARMOR!!!
Self proclaimed "GODZILLA Junkie"!

Weaver

Quote from: Nils on June 12, 2009, 08:04:41 AM
title says it all, just something i was thinking of yesterday evening  :rolleyes:
the plan is to build a carrier version of a usually land based aircraft/helicopter.

some exsamples could be Navalised Typhoons, gripens, P-51's, F-104's,.....

seriously, why should the air forces have all the best toys  ;D

How about a ZELL F-104 on an elevating launch rail bolted to the deck of a merchant ship, as a sort of jet-age equivalent of the CAMS Hurricanes?  ;D :wacko:
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

lancer

A few years ago I turned an Arado 196 into a carrier based torpedo bomber. I patterned the U/C on the Bf109 and I turned the Heinkel 70 into an Italian float plane using the floats from the Arado.
If you love, love without reservation; If you fight, fight without fear - THAT is the way of the warrior

If you go into battle knowing you will die, then you will live. If you go into battle hoping to live, then you will die

Daryl J.

The budget doesn't allow but Roden's new Siemens-Shuckert D.III begs for a set of floats with a dark blue fuselage/water lozenge.


:cheers:
Daryl J.

MAD

How about -

U.S Navy carrier-based variant of the CF-105 Arrow as a RA-5 Vigilante replacement (although could or should it really have been replaced??)

I like the idea put forward for a 'multi-role' carrier-based variant of the Saab Viggen - what with folding wings and its STOL performance!!

A RCN carrier-based CF-100 Canuck

An emergency adaption of a carrier-based variant of its IA-58 Pucara for the Argentinian Navy after the Falklands War, with folding wings, single main landing gear, and armed with torpedoes or an Exocet ASM after.

A carrier variant of the Joint Italian/Brazilian AMX for the Brazilian Navy to replace its A-4 Skyhawks.
With folding-wings, higher pressure tyres, arrester hook and radar equipped to fire Exocet ASM's

A PLANAF (People's Liberation Army Navy Air Force) adaption of the Xian JH-7A (Flying Leopard) for use as a strike/recon/EW aircraft for its rebuilt and revamped 'Varyag' ('Shi Lang') aircraft carrier. With folding-wings, folding tail fin, longer nose gear oleo, arrester hook.

M.A.D

MAD

Oh I almost forgot!!

A USN carrier-based General Dynamics/LTV F-16XL!
In both two-seat and single-seat variants
The long cranked-arrow delta folding-wings of this design would be interesting!
A strengthend twin wheel nose landing gear with longer oleo

The F/A-16XL design wins over the design proposal for the development of the more expensive F/A-18E/F.
It wins the USN's RFP due to its cheaper price and longer range capability!

M.A.D