Phaedra Models

Started by rickshaw, December 04, 2011, 06:16:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Green Dragon

Damn that looks good!
Hey Duncan, did you by any chance flog a Fujimi Cutlass on ebay? I bid on one from an "overkiller" but lost it coz I nodded off in front of the Computer!

Paul Harrison
"Well, it's rather brutal here. Right now we are advising all our clients to put everything they've got into canned food and shotguns."-Gremlins 2

On the bench.
1/72 Space 1999 Eagle, Comet Miniatures Martian War Machine
1/72nd Quad Tilt Rotor, 1/144th V/STOL E2 Hawkeye (stalled)

PR19_Kit

That's a lovely looking aeroplane Duncan and an impressive kit as well. I can't wait to see it after it's been 'Overkilled'.  ;D

Possibly just ASKING for a serious thread drift, but why didn't they put it into production?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on December 22, 2011, 08:02:40 AM
That's a lovely looking aeroplane Duncan and an impressive kit as well. I can't wait to see it after it's been 'Overkilled'.  ;D

Possibly just ASKING for a serious thread drift, but why didn't they put it into production?

Combination of cost and politics.  The engine was a US one and more expensive than a French developed one.  Politics because it came at a bad time with France having just withdrawn from NATO.  De Gaulle didn't want to be charged the exorbitant prices that the US Government wanted to for the newly developed TF-30 turbofan engine.  The French Air Force also decided (or had it decided for them) that their needs had changed and a smaller, cheaper interceptor F.1 was wanted - which coincidently also used a French engine.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Thorvic

Nice service, although why are Dassault providing duff info on their website ?  :banghead:

So sending them the F2 drawings scaled correctly  :wacko:
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Freightdog862

The sizing issue was a big worry when I did the P.1154 with Anigrand, seeing as we did not have a full set of actual plans. The SR.53 and 177 were much easier as they had hard copies of Barry Hygates drawings to work with. I feel for Patrice on this one, but good that Anigrand will fix it for him. The metal pitot is good to, the one on my SR.53 is oversize and I spoke to guys from Master at SMW about using them on later kits.

Colin   

kitnut617

Quote from: Freightdog862 on January 02, 2012, 12:48:13 PM
The sizing issue was a big worry when I did the P.1154 with Anigrand, seeing as we did not have a full set of actual plans.
Colin   

I wonder where Maintrack (now Whirlybird) got their sizes from then Colin ?  Have you compared your kit to one of those yet ?
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Freightdog862

We had the dims, and managed to get various section drawings sized correctly to 1/72nd, scribbled with notes of what bit needed changing and tweaking thanks to Mike Pryce. I was kindly loaned the Maintrack vacs from Geoff and Martin, the RAF one underside shape is very poor, and the RN includes a fir amount of guesswork, but they work out roughly the same overall size. It woulds have been so much easier to use one set of plans!

Colin

Supertom

Russ, your PLAAF stuff is fantastic!  Love that stuff.  Anyway these kits are bit rich for my wallet, which is too bad as I really like the Ye-152s.
"We can resolve this over tea and fisticuffs!!!"