Exhaust Piping & Radiators

Started by KJ_Lesnick, July 24, 2016, 12:03:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

KJ_Lesnick

I know race cars have to some extent shaped their radiators to conform to the meredith effect, have any tried to capitalize on exhaust thrust in anyway?
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

PR19_Kit

Depends how you define 'race car'.

In current F1 cars it'd be illegal because the exhaust has to exit at a defined point clear of the bodywork. Other formulas may differ of course.

There's a discussion on just that subject here, dated back in 2013 and majoring on F1 cars though.

http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15179
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Hobbes

#2
Spitfire exhaust thrust was only 70 lbs (on the Spitfire Mk I), from a 27-litre engine developing 1030 shp. Later marks with more efficient exhausts and more power developed more thrust.
In a car, the exhaust gases are badly matched to the car's speed [1] so the effect will be less pronounced than in an aircraft.

The effect is used in extreme cases, e.g. top fuel dragsters have their exhausts pointed upwards, as the 8000 shp engine will produce 800 lbs of downforce that way.

1: compare to the low efficiency of early turbojets at low speed.

kitnut617

Quote from: Hobbes on July 24, 2016, 02:30:46 PM
Spitfire exhaust thrust was only 70 lbs, from a 27-litre engine developing 1030 shp.

This is straight out of the Rolls Royce Heritage Trust book, 'Rolls Royce and the Crecy'. "A Merlin obtains about 150lb of thrust from it's exhaust."

Where the exhaust thrust works best though is at high altitude, an aircraft with a Crecy which was predicted to put out nearly 350lb of thrust, flying at those altitudes it was expected to increase the aircrafts speed by nearly 50mph.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Hobbes

The 150 lbs would have been for a later Merlin mark, I suspect.

The Crecy was specifically developed to increase exhaust thrust, with exhaust valves opening very early (IIRC while combustion was still going on).

kitnut617

The Crecy didn't have valves per say, it had sleeve valves. The book says, the port opened instantly ----

Incidentally,  the fuel was not mixed in the supercharger, just straight compressed air came from the supercharger and then fuel was injected at the right moment from the top.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Dizzyfugu

The turbo-charged R-3350 was definitively built around extra thrust from the exhausts, and many other aircraft/radial engines received in the course of WWII modified exhaust systems with single pipes for added thrust. One obvious case is the Mitsubishi A6M, and I also think that the Vought F4U's system for its R-2800 was changed accordingly from the -1 to the -4 version.

Additionally, the radiator system on some aircraft with liquid-cooled engines was also designed to generate extra thrust. The P-51's belly tunnel is one of these cases I know of.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Dizzyfugu on July 26, 2016, 11:39:42 PM

Additionally, the radiator system on some aircraft with liquid-cooled engines was also designed to generate extra thrust. The P-51's belly tunnel is one of these cases I know of.


The Mustang's cooling system is THE classic example of the Meredith Effect at work, but apparently even the Hurricane's and Spitfire's systems used it as well.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

KJ_Lesnick

Quote from: PR19_Kit on July 24, 2016, 12:35:43 PMDepends how you define 'race car'.

In current F1 cars it'd be illegal because the exhaust has to exit at a defined point clear of the bodywork.
I did not know that.  However, I suppose it would be useful on any sports-scar being able to use the radiator to generate thrust through a ram-compression process, and use the thrust of the exhaust pipes to push the car along/negate cooling drag


QuoteOther formulas may differ of course.

There's a discussion on just that subject here, dated back in 2013 and majoring on F1 cars though.

http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15179
I did find something interesting in there regarding NACA research on high speed flight...
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.