Fisher P-75 Eagle

[Tophe]

Ah!, it´s 8-engine. 

You are right: 4 double-engines are usually counted 8 engines.

[KJ_Lesnick]

Wuzak

1. Arithmetic

I was looking for information more around something like "they miscalculated the structural weight, they miscalculated the weight of the engines, they reduced the data wrong": I already know they miscalculated it, I was curious why.

2. The same, but different. Likely would involve just moving bits around slightly, like the wing forward or back.

So it would have been subtle.

[NARSES2]

Pacopepe, I like how you've done the rear props. Looks like they were meant to be there.

Looks like it would make a nice pusher only aircraft too. Then the nose could be loaded with guns or radar.

Thanks. Yes, the push version would be very interesting too.

Yes I was thinking only the same thing yesterday. The US had a fair few pushers being designed/schemed at the time this was being thought about as well

[Captain Canada]

Love the look of the twin...that would be one powerful machine !

[KJ_Lesnick]

1. Where would I go to find out the diameter of the Fischer Eagle's propellers?

2. Does anybody here know the diameter of the propellers on this aircraft?

[tomo pauk]

Looks like it was 12.7 ft diameter: http://retromechanix.com/fisher-p-75-advance-descriptive-data-may-20-1944/nggallery/image/image-750

[Dork the kit slayer]

http://plasticnostalgia.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/usaf-museum-research.html

Im not sure if Ive posted these here before if I have sorry.

A couple of pics here that may be of interest.  

[KJ_Lesnick]

tomo pauk

Looks like it was 12.7 ft diameter: http://retromechanix.com/fisher-p-75-advance-descriptive-data-may-20-1944/nggallery/image/image-750

Thanks!

[leptiprince]

Hi

Interesting change. Can you explain to me how you made the back. With it based? Thank you

Best