F-102 upgrades

Started by tigercat2, June 12, 2017, 09:48:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

KJ_Lesnick

#30
rickshaw

QuoteAnd yet, in 1950, the USAF was employing bomber streams to pound North Korean targets, some 5+ years after they had exploded and used the first atomic bombs.
True, but we weren't nuking those targets...
QuoteNot all targets would be considered worth a nuclear weapon, ran the thinking, so streams would still be employed to destroy them.
Good point...
QuoteRemember, what the Russians were going to do was a mystery for the most part.   The USAF modelled their opponent's strategy on their own for the most part.   What the USAF was going to, the Soviets were also going to do.
Did we plan to use streams for nuking too?
QuoteIt performed surprisingly well once it was used in dog fights by the USAF.
Yeah
QuoteIf they had given it AIM-9 and AIM-7 instead of the Falcon/Genies, it would have made a superb dog fighter IMO.
Yeah, that would have been something to see...

QuoteIt was an excellent joke, I don't doubt but it showed the potential of the aircraft.
Yup...
QuoteCombat Range:   Mirage IIIE - 1,200 km (746 mi; 648 nmi)
                               F-106A - 2,900 km (1,600 nmi)
F-106 wins
QuoteRate of climb: Mirage IIIE - 237 m/s (46,600 ft/min)
                          F-106A - 29,000 ft/min (150 m/s)
Wait, I thought their initial climb-rate was 40000 - 45000 feet per minute?
QuoteWing loading: Mirage IIIE - 270 kg/m2
                          F-10A - 52 lb/(sq ft) (255 kg/m²)
F-106A wins

I think the F-106 does quite well
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.