avatar_TomZ

Boulton Paul Jaguar Mk I

Started by TomZ, September 29, 2019, 10:28:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TomZ

Boulton Paul Jaguar Mk I



Specification F.6/42 called for a fighter with a high rate of climb (4,500ft/ min to 20,000ft), good acceleration and good manoeuvrability. Boulton Paul submitted two designs: the P-99 and P-100



The P.99 was a twin boom fighter, powered by a Rolls-Royce Griffon that powered contra rotating pusher propellers. The pilot's cockpit was in the nose, and was covered with a bubble cockpit. In case of emergencies the pilot was to escape downwards, using a system that involved jettisoning part of the lower front fuselage. The armament would have been carried in the nose. The low mounted wings had an equal span central section, and tapering outer panels. The twin booms went back from the wings, so were below the level of the fuselage. The horizontal tail surface connected the booms, and there was a single vertical tail in the centre. The undercarriage was of the conventional tail wheel type, with the retractable main wheels at the front of the booms and the tail wheel below the vertical tail.
Competing designs were the Folland Fo.117, Hawker P.1018, P.1019 & P.1020, Airspeed AS.56 and
Miles M.42. At the end of 1942 the two Boulton Paul designs were selected for development and two prototypes were ordered of each of them.



The first prototype P-99, now called Jaguar flew in January 1944 and showed a very good performance. After some trouble free trials 400 Jaguar Mk I aircraft were ordered for the RAF. The first production aircraft was delivered to the RAF in August 1944.
The Jaguar served as a heavy fighter and ground attack aircraft in France and later on also in the Pacific. In all 1250 Jaguars were built and the type remained in use until 1952.



Model made from the Unicraft 1/72 resin kit

TomZ
http://www.airwar1946.nl/index.htm
Reality is an illusion caused by an alcohol deficiency

chrisonord

The dogs philosophy on life.
If you cant eat it hump it or fight it,
Pee on it and walk away!!

Rick Lowe


PR19_Kit

See my comment under you other BP model.  ;D ;D ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Rheged

Quote from: PR19_Kit on September 29, 2019, 12:46:43 PM
See my comment under you other BP model.  ;D ;D ;D

Agree with your thoughts on both of these!!
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

Weaver

"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

Gondor

I would have thought that the aircraft would not have been that popular with it's pilots with the downward escape route and it being a groound attack aircraft  :o

Nice build though  :thumbsup:

Gondor
My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

zenrat

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

McColm


NARSES2

Another great effort Tom  :thumbsup:

Quote from: Gondor on September 29, 2019, 10:23:04 PM
I would have thought that the aircraft would not have been that popular with it's pilots with the downward escape route and it being a groound attack aircraft  :o


True, but then most ground attack aircraft, if hit, would have been to low to facilitate even a normal bale out ? Although at least the pilot might have thought he had a better chance ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

comrade harps

Quote from: NARSES2 on September 30, 2019, 07:21:26 AM
Another great effort Tom  :thumbsup:

Quote from: Gondor on September 29, 2019, 10:23:04 PM
I would have thought that the aircraft would not have been that popular with it's pilots with the downward escape route and it being a groound attack aircraft  :o


True, but then most ground attack aircraft, if hit, would have been to low to facilitate even a normal bale out ? Although at least the pilot might have thought he had a better chance ?

The Starfighter of its day!

It reminds me more of a tadpole than a jaguar, but that's just me. Looks good  :thumbsup:
Whatever.

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]