Mission Models Acylics?

Started by rickshaw, May 23, 2020, 03:50:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

zenrat

The name rings a bell from somewhere but i've not used them.

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

I've certainly heard of Mission Models Paints, but can't remember if they were acrylic or enamel.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

They come up on UK eBay under a search, but not the whole range like Brian's example.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

jcf

Some folks I know swear by it, others haven't
been able to get it to work, others have gone
meh. It is finicky and pretty much intended as
as an airbrush applied "system". They claim
it can be used with a brush, but I don't know
anyone who has used it in that way. Evidently
the owner can be hard to deal with and if you
have any issues with the paint it's all your
fault.

Here's MMP's Tech Tips and FAQs page:
https://www.missionmodelsus.com/pages/tips-and-tricks-faq



ChernayaAkula

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on May 24, 2020, 08:55:59 AM
Some folks I know swear by it, others haven't
been able to get it to work, others have gone
meh. <...>

So.... just like every other brand of paint, then?  ;)  ;D :rolleyes:
Cheers,
Moritz


Must, then, my projects bend to the iron yoke of a mechanical system? Is my soaring spirit to be chained down to the snail's pace of matter?

jcf

Quote from: ChernayaAkula on May 24, 2020, 01:49:09 PM
Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on May 24, 2020, 08:55:59 AM
Some folks I know swear by it, others haven't
been able to get it to work, others have gone
meh. <...>

So.... just like every other brand of paint, then?  ;)  ;D :rolleyes:

Far worse, especially as the paint isn't really a acrylic it's a polyurethane,
the primers require the thinner to activate - you have to use it to get the
primer to work and the optional poly dos the same for the topcoats. The
poly gives the paint an eggshell rather than a flat finish.
The paints and the activating nature of the reducer and additives remind me
of the System 3 water carried polyurethane marine paints, they also use a
reducer that the primers require and an additive that does the same to the paint,
except they call it what it is an additive that 'cross-links' the paint changing the
chemistry and making it far stronger, just like the 2nd part of a regular two-part
non-water carried polyurethane or a two-pack acrylic lacquer.
I used the System3 paint 30years ago when it was just new, and frankly the
"revolutionary MMP" looks, smells and functions pretty much like the System3,
which BTW sprayed beautifully even in Hawai'i conditions and produced a smooth
eggshell finish that leveled out so beautifully that the spars I had painted looked
like they had been dipped in plastic.   

zenrat

Jon's post above has reminded me of reading about these paints.  Not where I read it but that at the time I thought "why?  Do we really need a revolutionary new system?  What's wrong with the one we have?  For painting models anyway."
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

Reading Jon's fascinating post made me realise just how long ago it was I took my O Level Chemistry.  My first thoughts if I'm honest were "life's to short", but each to his own.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.