avatar_Orionblamblam

Project Orion: the spacegoing battleship

Started by Orionblamblam, February 04, 2009, 04:50:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Orionblamblam


KJ_Lesnick

One of the Orion's had a doomsday warhead of 1,600 tons?  :blink:

If I recall correctly, the most efficient nuclear warhead we ever produced was the Mk.41, which produced 5.2 or 5.6 megatons per ton, and in 1963 it was stated that we could have produced a 35 megaton warhead mountable on a Titan II (3700 kg), 50-70 megatons for the payload used on a B-52 (10,000 lbs).  With figures like that you're talking about 8.5 megatons/ton for a Titan warhead or 5-7 megatons/ton for the heavier warheads.

That's a yield of 8 - 13.6 gigatons...
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

SleeperService

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on July 29, 2015, 05:33:49 PM
One of the Orion's had a doomsday warhead of 1,600 tons?  :blink:

If I recall correctly, the most efficient nuclear warhead we ever produced was the Mk.41, which produced 5.2 or 5.6 megatons per ton, and in 1963 it was stated that we could have produced a 35 megaton warhead mountable on a Titan II (3700 kg), 50-70 megatons for the payload used on a B-52 (10,000 lbs).  With figures like that you're talking about 8.5 megatons/ton for a Titan warhead or 5-7 megatons/ton for the heavier warheads.

That's a yield of 8 - 13.6 gigatons...

Most of that would be wasted (Thankfully) as 100megatons would blast clean through the atmosphere any extra would mostly take the line of least resistance and follow it. On the other hand seeding 1600 tons of radioactive Cobalt or strontium into the atmosphere would be rather final.