avatar_Tophe

Boeing-X Sensor-Y (finished part 2 page 5+5, part1 page3)

Started by Tophe, January 13, 2022, 07:12:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tophe

A Me-262 1/144 may be a donor kit for the jets. Revell or Mark 1 or Trumpeter, at least, according to Google.
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Flyer

But then I'd have some 262's without engines, and I don't want that so I'll find some pen tubes or scrapped toy parts or something. :thumbsup:
"I'm a precisional instrument of speed and aromatics." - Tow Mater.

"People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing all day." - A. A. Milne.

Tophe

Yes, for us what-ifers it is more easy than for serious (sad) modellers! ;D ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

From the CJ-51D, the back is improved lowering down the wing into CJ-51D-2, but (with my angle of view) the aspect is less clean ("canopy in jet").
Then with more external jets into CJ-51D-3 the aspect is better, while the pilot would face worse asymmetry problem if one engine is in a jam.
:-\ <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/P-51_persp_D_bz.jpg
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Wardukw

You getting it now Tophe mate...its looking pretty sweet now ...for the engines its much easier in 48th than 1/144 scales.
Id make em from plastic tubes and use pen tips for the velocity stacks and just wiffy the the hell out of the tail pipes .
The P51s fusealge will need to be lenghtened and a wee bit of reshaping to the nose as its got no propeller anymore and the complete custom build on the landing gear..tricycle landing gear for sure .
The wings will need a heap of work to sort out but its nothing hard ..hardest part is grafting the engines into the wings ..hard part is making them clean..i suck at that  :lol:.
Hey Tophe what do ya think about giving the wings a slight rear wards taper..angle the outer wings from the engine back..not to much..that might look pretty cool.
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

Tophe

Thanks.

I try to follow your words while... backwards (as you say) or forward (for a better lift centering?)? <_<

= link http://www.kristofmeunier.fr/P-51_persp_D_ca.jpg
(in fact, I am not at all an engineer, just a dreamer) ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Wardukw

Ohhhhh Tophe mate  :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:..both look amazing dude  ;D
Damn i like the forward swept wing ..rearwards sweep is very cool but the forward sweep is brilliant  ;D
You absolutely nailed it again mate..that has got to be built .
Next week im gonna hunt down and buy the cheapest 48th scale Mustang i can get..this is to cool a design not to build.
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .

Tophe

Thanks a lot for such an enthusiasm, from our cooperation... ;D
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Wardukw

Your design's buddy are what is going to make this come to life..my ideas are useless to a point..so much easier when the idea can be seen first..thrn ya know if its going to work for not..in this case..dude it worked out great  ;D
If it aint broke ,,fix it until it is .
Over kill is often very understated .
I know the voices in my head ain't real but they do come up with some great ideas.
Theres few of lifes problems that can't be solved with the proper application of a high explosive projectile .