M6 Heavy Tanks Questions and What-if Ideas

Started by dy031101, June 06, 2009, 09:13:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jcf

Quote from: dy031101 on June 08, 2009, 03:24:59 PM
So that big turret from the T29 was enough to bring the weight from 63 tons to 77...... or did the electric transmission also play a role in the M6A2E1 being so heavy?

There is only a 500lb difference in the empty (unstowed) weight between the electrical (T1E1) and mechanical (T1E2) transmission versions of the base vehicle - 120,500 lbs vs. 120,000 lbs.

Adding the T29 turret to the T1E1 ballooned the empty (unstowed) weight up to 147,000 lbs.


dy031101

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on June 08, 2009, 03:41:44 PM
There is only a 500lb difference in the empty (unstowed) weight between the electrical (T1E1) and mechanical (T1E2) transmission versions of the base vehicle - 120,500 lbs vs. 120,000 lbs.

Which transmission was relatively more successful?
To the individual soldiers, *everything* is a frontal assault!

====================

Current Hobby Priority...... Sigh......

To-do list here

Doc Yo

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on June 08, 2009, 03:17:21 PM
Quote from: Doc Yo on June 08, 2009, 02:53:37 PM
Forgive this tangential question- I've seen the first US 'heavy tank'* described as a multi-turret beast
mounting a pair of 75mm and another pair of 37mm cannons. Though I have run across the description
more than once, I've never seen any plans or illustrations of the project. Did it ever get as far as blueprints,
or was it never mor than a list of requirements?


* Discounting the 'Universal' tank of 1918.

No illustration in Hunnicutt's Firepower, so if he couldn't find one it probably doesn't exist.
He does state that the "military characteristics were revised" by OCM16200 prior to the construction of a mockup.
Those revisions embodied the single turret T1 as built.


Ah, thats what I was afraid of, but thanks for the response anyhow. may have to start another thread...
ideas are percolating...