Battlecarrier Query

Started by Cobra, November 09, 2009, 02:19:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cobra

Hey Guys, because of the game 'Naval Ops Warship Gunner' I'm wondering if the Ship type called a 'Battlecarrier' was ever studied or was it just a Designer's Whif Dream????? would the Battlecarrier be Something to Whif or Not?? i ask because I'm Curious & want to know if there are Any Models on the Market of such a Thing?? thanks for looking. Dan

sideshowbob9

#1
I have a book full of proposed battlecarrier designs, "The Hybrid Warship". It contains battlecarrier concepts from pre-war, to some rather outlandish Soviet post-war designs right up to aviation-capable Spruances. I wholeheartedly recommend it!

Edit: Ouch! Disn't pay this much for it! http://www.amazon.com/Hybrid-Warship-Amalgamation-Guns-Aircraft/dp/1557503745/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1257766371&sr=8-1-spell

What info were you after?


Cobra

I'm trying to find out how many Different Configurations & Types were Considered as well as What Countries studied it! does that Help???????

dy031101

Quote from: Cobra on November 09, 2009, 02:19:31 AM
Hey Guys, because of the game 'Naval Ops Warship Gunner' I'm wondering if the Ship type called a 'Battlecarrier' was ever studied or was it just a Designer's Whif Dream????? would the Battlecarrier be Something to Whif or Not?? i ask because I'm Curious & want to know if there are Any Models on the Market of such a Thing??

Try here and here.

IIRC, you'll find the "Delaware class battlecarrier" in the Soviet Navy section because it was proposed for the Soviets before the latter invaded Poland.

With the exception of the Ise class, you'll have to do a lot of scratch-building to create in plastic the battlecarriers in the game.
To the individual soldiers, *everything* is a frontal assault!

====================

Current Hobby Priority...... Sigh......

To-do list here

RLBH

It has been looked at repeatedly, and rejected pretty much every time (the only possible exception being the Kiev class aviation cruisers). The reason was quite elegantly demonstrated by an RN officer: you could get more guns at sea and more aircraft at sea by building separate ships. Unfortunately, I can't find the quote right now, but the numbers worked out very nicely.

dy031101

Quote from: RLBH on November 09, 2009, 01:31:45 PM
It has been looked at repeatedly, and rejected pretty much every time (the only possible exception being the Kiev class aviation cruisers). The reason was quite elegantly demonstrated by an RN officer: you could get more guns at sea and more aircraft at sea by building separate ships.

What's the manpower requirement of the Kiev class cruisers compared to seperate ships in the West?

Thanks in advance.
To the individual soldiers, *everything* is a frontal assault!

====================

Current Hobby Priority...... Sigh......

To-do list here

Jschmus

According to Wikipedia, the crew complement of a Kiev-class vessel was 1200-1600 (including the air wing).
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."-Alan Moore