Hypersonic Bomber in Lieu of XB-70

Started by KJ_Lesnick, January 27, 2014, 09:22:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

wuzak

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 25, 2014, 02:49:08 PM
QuoteICBM sites may have been on the list. But not all Soviet nuclear weapons were in ICBM sites. Some were on submarines.
Good point, did we know where most of their submarines were in the 60's?

Doubtful.

Some of their missiles were also designed to be carried on rail cars, and therefore would have some limited mobility. Though that may have been later.

rickshaw

Quote from: wuzak on February 25, 2014, 05:49:38 PM
Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 25, 2014, 02:49:08 PM
QuoteICBM sites may have been on the list. But not all Soviet nuclear weapons were in ICBM sites. Some were on submarines.
Good point, did we know where most of their submarines were in the 60's?

Doubtful.

Some of their missiles were also designed to be carried on rail cars, and therefore would have some limited mobility. Though that may have been later.

Much later.  The RT-23 Molodets ICBM was only operational on railway based launchers in 1987.  As the fUSSR broke up in 1991, it's rather outside the picture.  The USAF proposed rail based Minuteman IIIs and later MX or Midgetman missiles, none of which even reached the testing stages, let alone operational deployment.  The fUSSR fielded 97 RT-23s - 36 based in stationary silos and 56 rail-based, all deactivated after 1991 (in Ukraine where the majority of the silo based missiles were) and about 2000 (for the remaining 10 silo systems and all the rail based ones).
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

rickshaw

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 25, 2014, 02:49:08 PM
Rick

I never saw "On The Beach"

Read the book, its far better and well worth it, if you want to taste how people in the late 1950s feared the world would end from a nuclear apocalypse - not with a bang but a whimper...
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

wuzak

Quote from: rickshaw on February 25, 2014, 06:48:50 PM
Quote from: wuzak on February 25, 2014, 05:49:38 PM
Doubtful.

Some of their missiles were also designed to be carried on rail cars, and therefore would have some limited mobility. Though that may have been later.

Much later.  The RT-23 Molodets ICBM was only operational on railway based launchers in 1987.  As the fUSSR broke up in 1991, it's rather outside the picture.  The USAF proposed rail based Minuteman IIIs and later MX or Midgetman missiles, none of which even reached the testing stages, let alone operational deployment.  The fUSSR fielded 97 RT-23s - 36 based in stationary silos and 56 rail-based, all deactivated after 1991 (in Ukraine where the majority of the silo based missiles were) and about 2000 (for the remaining 10 silo systems and all the rail based ones).

Thanks Rick.

I wasn't sure when they were.

kitbasher

Quote from: rickshaw on February 25, 2014, 06:55:29 PM
Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 25, 2014, 02:49:08 PM
Rick

I never saw "On The Beach"

Read the book, its far better and well worth it, if you want to taste how people in the late 1950s feared the world would end from a nuclear apocalypse - not with a bang but a whimper...

Yes, the book is excellent. Although the film does feature a very sultry looking Ava Gardner.

And Fred Astaire!
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on February 25, 2014, 06:55:29 PM
Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 25, 2014, 02:49:08 PM
Rick

I never saw "On The Beach"

Read the book, its far better and well worth it, if you want to taste how people in the late 1950s feared the world would end from a nuclear apocalypse - not with a bang but a whimper...

Well, the bit of the world where you are anyway. The rest of us had 'gone with a bang' already according to Mr. Shute.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on February 26, 2014, 01:02:18 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on February 25, 2014, 06:55:29 PM
Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 25, 2014, 02:49:08 PM
Rick

I never saw "On The Beach"

Read the book, its far better and well worth it, if you want to taste how people in the late 1950s feared the world would end from a nuclear apocalypse - not with a bang but a whimper...

Well, the bit of the world where you are anyway. The rest of us had 'gone with a bang' already according to Mr. Shute.

Well, my defence is that I was referring to the whole world, not just the other half...
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

jcf

Ironic aint' it how Pommieland went out with a Bang and Oz with a Whinge?  ;D

rickshaw

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on February 26, 2014, 09:03:24 AM
Ironic aint' it how Pommieland went out with a Bang and Oz with a Whinge?  ;D

If you read the book, we face it basically with typical Australian abandon, mixed with stoicism and a fair touch of annoyance at the irresponsibility of those who have proclaimed themselves our betters throughout history...
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

zenrat

Not seen it or read it but the father of a friend of mine was an RN submariner (he is 6'7" so that branch of the service was a foregone conclusion from the moment he signed up) and claims the back of his head can be seen in the movie.


Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

jcf

Quote from: rickshaw on February 26, 2014, 03:43:51 PM
Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on February 26, 2014, 09:03:24 AM
Ironic aint' it how Pommieland went out with a Bang and Oz with a Whinge?  ;D

If you read the book, we face it basically with typical Australian abandon, mixed with stoicism and a fair touch of annoyance at the irresponsibility of those who have proclaimed themselves our betters throughout history...

I read the book over forty years ago, so yes I know how it goes.