Alternative uses for Naval SAMs

Started by rickshaw, October 10, 2012, 08:58:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

I wonder if there were ever any serious proposals to mount naval SAMs on land or aircraft?   I'd have thought it would have made perfect sense to do so.  I'm aware that the USN mounted Terrier on a land launcher for the USMC and it saw limited service with them.  I wonder if the RN might have done something similar with Sea Slug or Sea Dart?  I'm aware of the Seacat/Tigercat link.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Thorvic

Well with the British Sea Dart there was the propossed Land Dart system using containerised missiles on a quad launcher as a Bloodhound replacement.

In Chris Gibsons BSP:IV he covers the CF.299 which was an air launched derrative of the Sea Dart program and in Vulcans Hammer we have the Vulcan with an Air Search radar and 10 wing mounted fully fledged Sea Darts as a long range interceptor.
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Hobbes

There's also the AGM-78 Standard anti-radiation missile. And the Sparrow went the other way round.

rickshaw

Quote from: Thorvic on October 10, 2012, 10:22:35 PM
Well with the British Sea Dart there was the propossed Land Dart system using containerised missiles on a quad launcher as a Bloodhound replacement.

In Chris Gibsons BSP:IV he covers the CF.299 which was an air launched derrative of the Sea Dart program and in Vulcans Hammer we have the Vulcan with an Air Search radar and 10 wing mounted fully fledged Sea Darts as a long range interceptor.

I'd assume that an air-launched version would need to have some sort "blow-off" nose cap to cover that yawning ramjet intake?
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

scooter

Quote from: Hobbes on October 11, 2012, 12:39:14 AM
There's also the AGM-78 Standard anti-radiation missile. And the Sparrow went the other way round.

I also recall, vaguely, the AF testing the SM2 on the Darts as an air to air missile
The F-106- 26 December 1956 to 8 August 1988
Gone But Not Forgotten

QuoteOh are you from Wales ?? Do you know a fella named Jonah ?? He used to live in whales for a while.
— Groucho Marx

My dA page: Scooternjng

pyro-manic

Quote from: rickshaw on October 11, 2012, 12:43:57 AM
I'd assume that an air-launched version would need to have some sort "blow-off" nose cap to cover that yawning ramjet intake?

There's no drawing, but the text (BSP4, P.44) says:

QuoteInternal carriage was preferred for CF.299 due to drag from the ramjet intake, which would otherwise require an aerodynamic fairing and attendant jettison system.

The missile itself was similar to the ship-based system, but had much larger fins with a span of 3ft 10" - this led to carriage problems with the P.1154 - the intended platform - only able to carry two. There's a nice drawing of a Sea Vixen toting four, though.
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

rickshaw

Was the CF.299 version two or single staged?

Any chance of posting that drawing?  I don't have BSP4.  :(
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Hobbes

#7
There's also the VC-10 proposal carrying 18 CF.299s.

BSP.4 isn't conclusive about it, but the drawings are of a CF.299 without booster.

(Rickshaw, check your PM re. a scan of the drawing)

Cliffy B

NASA has been using old Terrier and Talos SAMs for tests and other purposes for many, many years.  The USN also proposed using the nuclear versions of each for surface and land attack for many years and even built classes of ships with no guns because of that.

The USN was developing the LASM or Land Attack Standard Missile of the Standard SAM.  Money caused it to be canceled like so many other things.

They also developed a land attack version of the ASROC ASW rocket called SMARTROC.  They adapted a Mk-82 500lb bomb to the standard ASROC rocket body and it proved highly successful.  They even developed a longer range version.  It was designed to give the older Gearing-class DDs to a better fire support capability beyond their 5"/38s.  Money again...
"Helos don't fly.  They vibrate so violently that the ground rejects them."
-Tom Clancy

"Radial's Growl, Inline's Purr, Jet's Suck!"
-Anonymous

"If all else fails, call in an air strike."
-Anonymous

Joe C-P

The Iranians adapted Hawk SAMs to be carried on F-14s, and reportedly tested Standard SAMs.
In want of hobby space!  The kitchen table is never stable.  Still managing to get some building done.

Diamondback

Quote from: scooter on October 11, 2012, 03:22:21 AM
Quote from: Hobbes on October 11, 2012, 12:39:14 AM
There's also the AGM-78 Standard anti-radiation missile. And the Sparrow went the other way round.

I also recall, vaguely, the AF testing the SM2 on the Darts as an air to air missile
Captive-carry only, but i also seem to recall the Six/STARM combo being proposed as an ASAT platform. I'll post something over on the F-106 forum about it and ask for help from our gang of old crewdogs and wrenchslingers.

Thorvic

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Diamondback

#12
And one of my peeps, who now crew-chiefs a preserved Six at PCAM in Santa Rosa, hooked us up. Project Spike, an anti-missile program...

http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/spike.htm
http://www.losangeles.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-060912-028.pdf

Hope these help! :) I'm also working up some Tomcat and Strike Eagle WHIFs where Spike and ASAT are both reactivated by a PMC/R&D firm for expedient launch of small, expendable "need coverage RIGHT NOW" microsatellites.