avatar_NARSES2

Vanguard for Imphal

Started by NARSES2, July 28, 2011, 07:29:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

NARSES2

This is the first WIF I've finished in a while (been working on real stuff).

Vultee P48 Vanguard "Joe Soap II" of 155 Sqd somewhere near Imphal in 1943.

Supposing instead of relegating the P48's they received to second line duties in Canada the RAF had pressed some of them into service ? Well in my world they did and 2 Squadrons in India were equiped with them, instead of the Mohawks they actually got. These aircraft served until late 1943 when they were replaced by Spitfires.

The model is the AZ one, which is quite nice and goes together well. They also don't overdo the etch and resin which I find can be a pain in some of these kits. The markings/colour scheme are from a AML Mohawk kit which includes a couple of 155 Sqd options. I am assuming the yellow wing tips are identity markings used before the white stripes were standardised in late 1944. Likewise the blue/white roundels.


Chris


http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a134/NARSES2/P48Vanguard001.jpg[/img]]





Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Army of One

Great looking build there Chris.....love the paint work.... :thumbsup:
BODY,BODY....HEAD..!!!!

IF YER HIT, YER DEAD!!!!

deathjester

Very, very nice work Chris!  Have I started a fashion for these markings??!! :wacko:

Eddie M.

Very exceptional work. I like the color combination a lot! :)  :cheers:
Look behind you!

rickshaw

Good one.  Like that a lot.   :thumbsup:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Quote from: deathjester on July 28, 2011, 10:05:58 AM
Very, very nice work Chris!  Have I started a fashion for these markings??!! :wacko:

It's interesting. I for one forgot that the classic SEAC markings (White stripes & small SEAC roundels) didn't really become standard until late 1944. Prior to that numerous ID markings were tried out including these yellow wing tips. On some aircraft the yellow covered a far larger area on the underside of the wing then it did on the top surface. Prior to late 44 it almost appears as if there was a lot of lattitude as to ID markings especially among squadrons issued with radial engined aircraft.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Mike Wren


sideshowbob9


Brian da Basher

Most well done, Narses! Your take on SEA camo is superb!!!
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Brian da Basher

NARSES2

Quote from: Brian da Basher on August 03, 2011, 04:50:22 PM
Most well done, Narses! Your take on SEA camo is superb!!!


Can't claim credit for that Brian. It's the real world scheme worn by 155 Sqds Mohawks in late 43
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!

kitbasher

Top banana, mate.  Not a subject you see that often, especially as a whif.
;D ;D
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

Pablo1965

Your variant is really plausible if the Vanguard been used in the Pacific theatre, this is one of my favourite planes. Your version is very nice. :thumbsup: :cheers: :bow:

Hman

Nice, very nice.  The coaster give me an idea, use them as display bases.  Large enough for a fighter sized plane, but won't overwell the whole appreacen of the model, just a thought?
"Lusaka Tower, this is Green Leader..."

NARSES2

Quote from: Hman on August 14, 2011, 08:20:15 AM
The coaster give me an idea, use them as display bases.  Large enough for a fighter sized plane, but won't overwell the whole appreacen of the model, just a thought?

Yup, been using them for a while. Portable and nice and cheap in "Poundland" - 4 or 5 for a £1  :thumbsup: Cover them in railway "flock" if you want and "Bob's your uncle"  ;D
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.