avatar_GTX

Ruhrstahl Kramer X-4 Missiles

Started by GTX, April 09, 2011, 03:21:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GTX

Here, Gondor stated "I wish someone sold X-4's as accessories in 1/72 and 1/48 scales as I do not want to buy kits just to steal missiles from them."

Well maybe I can help.  See http://www.capehobby.com/Aircraft_Resin_Models_CHG.html

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Thorvic

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

Gondor

Thank you guys....... just what the Dr Ordered.

Gondor
My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

renax

just for info, I think I still ahve some X-4 missiles kit..; 1/12 scale.

http://www.sharkit.com/sharkit/X4/X4.htm

TsrJoe

hmmm, im thinking the large size missile might make for a fun 'luft 46' manned VTO. type thing kindv like the Heinkel and Matra tailsitting designs of the 50's
... 'i reject your reality and substitute my own !'

IPMS.UK. 'Project Cancelled' Special Interest Group Co-co'ordinator (see also our Project Cancelled FB.group page)
IPMS.UK. 'TSR-2 SIG.' IPMS.UK. 'What-if SIG.' (TSR.2 Research Group, Finnoscandia & WW.2.5 FB. groups)


PR19_Kit

Cor, that's like a crosss between a Miles M52 and a SNCASO Trident. Love it!  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

JayBee

Alle kunst ist umsunst wenn ein engel auf das zundloch brunzt!!

Sic biscuitus disintegratum!

Cats are not real. 
They are just physical manifestations of collisions between enigma & conundrum particles.

Any aircraft can be improved by giving it a SHARKMOUTH!

PR19_Kit

Quote from: JayBee on November 08, 2011, 12:49:04 PM
How was it meant to land?


Backwards? Like an XFY-1 Pogo perhaps?

Difficult but not impossible. Mind you with the throttle response of early jet engines it could have been a REAL pig!
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

renax

it was a configuration study for a tail sitter;

landing, hm....like all tail sitter....

the pilot was prone

http://renax-sharkit.blogspot.com/2011/09/le-post-est-la.html

rickshaw

Thats a very nice diorama.  Very spectacular takeoff (or landing).   How did you do the clouds of smoke?
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Quote from: rickshaw on November 09, 2011, 04:18:20 AM
Thats a very nice diorama.  Very spectacular takeoff (or landing).   How did you do the clouds of smoke?

Looks like styrofoam ?

Fantastic little vingette  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.