WW2 Fireship

Started by tigercat, April 26, 2012, 04:31:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

tigercat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Lucid

Apparently there was a plan to revive fireships and send a bunch of knackered tankers into harbours withthe German invasion fleet and blow them up.

Unfortunately the only ships that could be sacrificed were so knackered they never made it over

Is there any way they could have made it work .

Were there any convoy survivors that were  so damaged they couldn't be repaired that could have been used but could still get across the channel.

How knackered did a ship have to be before it was written off?

Would it have worked if it was a standard cargo ship packed with explosives rather than a tanker

I'm thinking yes I seem to remember an explosion at an american port in peacetime that caused considerable devastation.


If it had succeeded would the Germans have been much more suspicious when it came time for Operation Chariot and the Campbelltown.

Mossie

The St Nazaire raid was along these lines, HMS Campbletown was equipped with explosives and detonated in the dock that was intended to house Tirpitz.  It was a complex raid using Commandos and subterfuge.  Getting any fireship into a dock was going to be difficult but possible as the St Nazaire raid showed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Nazaire_Raid

From what I can gather, the Campbletown was an obscelesent destroyer that had been damaged on several occasions.  Her usefulness was diminished, as was her abilility to absorb further damage and this led to her selection for the raid.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

tigercat

They didn't suspect that she was packed with explosives. However if we got into the habit of sending ships into their harbours and blowing them up they may have looked harder or tried to tow her away.

deathjester

How about submersibles equipped with high powered flamethrowers?

Mossie

Quote from: tigercat on April 26, 2012, 06:34:51 AM
They didn't suspect that she was packed with explosives. However if we got into the habit of sending ships into their harbours and blowing them up they may have looked harder or tried to tow her away.

Also the defences of the atlantic wall were strengthened as a result, the Germans pretty much closed the door after the raid.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

kitbasher

Quote from: Mossie on April 26, 2012, 06:22:19 AM
From what I can gather, the Campbletown was an obscelesent destroyer that had been damaged on several occasions.  Her usefulness was diminished, as was her abilility to absorb further damage and this led to her selection for the raid.

Campbeltown was indeed very obsolescent - obsolete even - originally the USS Buchanan, and transferred to the Royal Navy in 1940 as part of the Destroyers for Bases Agreement.  See more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Campbeltown_(I42).

I'd not thought of her as a latter day fireship, but it's an excellent analogy.
;D ;D
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

raafif

Quote from: deathjester on April 26, 2012, 09:36:55 AM
How about submersibles equipped with high powered flamethrowers?

With a proper crew, Surcouf might have made a good "dragon-ship" ....... renamed the Loch Ness Monster.

After the take-over, her crew were mainly farmers & other non-sailors -- her guns were too complex for submerged work too.
you may as well all give up -- the truth is much stranger than fiction.

I'm not sick ... just a little unwell.

NARSES2

Rather then fireships what about blockships ? They were used in WWI at Ostend
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

rickshaw

Quote from: raafif on April 26, 2012, 06:20:20 PM
Quote from: deathjester on April 26, 2012, 09:36:55 AM
How about submersibles equipped with high powered flamethrowers?

With a proper crew, Surcouf might have made a good "dragon-ship" ....... renamed the Loch Ness Monster.

After the take-over, her crew were mainly farmers & other non-sailors -- her guns were too complex for submerged work too.

I've always been partial to the RN's M-class submarines.  Armed with a single 12in gun, they were able to surface, just with the tip of the barrel and the periscope above the water, open the muzzle door and fire and then submerge immediately.   While a failure in real life for various reasons, if they'd used them instead of for commerce raiding (their intended role), shore bombardment harassment raids, I don't doubt they'd have made life very hard for the opposition.  You'd never know where or when an M class would surface, fire and disappear again.

How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

tigercat

Blockships might work although from the number of French/ Italian  ships that were put back in service after being sunk I get the impression that the Germans were quite good at salvage



rickshaw

Block ships are useful for short term blocking of channels.  However, unless they are covered by your fire, the enemy will lift them quite quickly.  Salvage was already a high art by WWII, with all sides able to refloat quite heavily damaged ships, quite quickly.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Quote from: rickshaw on April 27, 2012, 06:48:21 AM
Block ships are useful for short term blocking of channels.  However, unless they are covered by your fire, the enemy will lift them quite quickly.  Salvage was already a high art by WWII, with all sides able to refloat quite heavily damaged ships, quite quickly.

Yup I suppose they would only be temporary
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

deathjester

Quote from: NARSES2 on April 27, 2012, 07:06:01 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on April 27, 2012, 06:48:21 AM
Block ships are useful for short term blocking of channels.  However, unless they are covered by your fire, the enemy will lift them quite quickly.  Salvage was already a high art by WWII, with all sides able to refloat quite heavily damaged ships, quite quickly.

Yup I suppose they would only be temporary
Not if you build in a time delay depth charge release system... :wacko: :wacko: :wacko: