avatar_Archibald

Machine Guns and Cannons (Ground, Vehicle, and Aircraft Mounted Weapons)

Started by Archibald, June 30, 2007, 12:51:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jcf

Quote from: pyro-manic on December 07, 2014, 05:05:12 AM

Re. downward-firing Schrage-musik, I seem to recall reading about a project (possibly Japanese?) where a big aircraft (a medium bomber or transport, I think) had a massive array of rifle-calibre machine guns fitted in the belly, firing downwards. The idea being to fly over eg. a beach landing, and shooting up the troops getting off the landing craft...?

Mukade (centipede) was the Japanese concept and used cannon, from page 1 of thread:
http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,19887.msg227211.html#msg227211

pyro-manic

Aha. It's the 400 x 7.7mm machine guns that I remembered! For "anti-ship" use... :blink:
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

jcf


rickshaw

Talking about massed MGs/Cannons, there is the Spanish Naval Meroka CIWS, which uses 12 x 20mm cannon, which fire in salvo to destroy incoming missiles.



There is also a ground mount version:

How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

jcf

... a self-loading Mitrailleuse, Napoleon III's dream come true.  ;D

rickshaw

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on December 07, 2014, 05:18:06 PM
... a self-loading Mitrailleuse, Napoleon III's dream come true.  ;D

Reminds me more of the Nordenfeldt...

I've seen a drawing of it's in turret configuration and it's feed mechanism and barrel configuration are quite interesting.  The barrels actually start out quite widely spaced and are then are clamped together, having gentle curves to bring the muzzles to close parallel.  The feed mechanism feeds 12 rounds at a time, one to each barrel, top and bottom layer.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

DarrenP

Quote from: Weaver on December 07, 2014, 05:20:50 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on December 06, 2014, 10:40:52 PM
The F1's bayonet was the same as the L1a1's.  I am unsure whom had the bolt grooves first but it may be that the F1 did copy them from the Sterling (IIRC the Patchett didn't have them).

The Patchett did have the grooves according to what I was reading last night.

The Sterling bayonet was the SLR bayonet with a wider diameter ring on it. Looking at the way the bayonet attaches on the F1, I think they probably made it use the standard SLR one.

Sterling used the same bayonet as the number 5 lee enfield did it not?

DarrenP

there is of course "Metal storm" a multi barrelled weapon firing electronically multiple rounds

rickshaw

Quote from: DarrenP on December 08, 2014, 05:35:45 PM
there is of course "Metal storm" a multi barrelled weapon firing electronically multiple rounds

Still very much a solution looking for a problem IMHO. 

Metal Storm represents some interesting ideas BUT they come with some considerable complications.  The use of multiple rounds in a barrel effectively means you either have to change barrels if you encounter a different sort of target or discard the first barrel, which is ultimately wasteful in resources (and possibly dangerous, what is there to stop your foe picking up the discarded barrel, still with rounds inside it, for his own use later on?).  A good example is if you have a grenade launcher with HE rounds in it and suddenly an AFV appears.  You need AP but you're stuck with HE - either you swap barrels or you fire the HE rounds and reload, both take more time than a convention grenade launcher.

Another is the multiple barrel weapons with their incredible rates of fire.  They don't seem to have taken into account the recoil from firing the theoretical million rounds a minute they claim it can achieve, as all their test weapons don't have any recoil mechanism and are simply staked into the ground and only fire light calibre rounds.  If they are going to be used on a ship, the ship's decks will need considerable reinforcing if the calibre is anything greater than rifle calibre.  That means any weight savings claimed are actually transferred to the ship from the weapon mounting.

Finally, something Metal Storm doesn't seem to address is the differences in accuracy and velocity each round in the barrel experiences to it's ballistics.  The first round has a shorter barrel length and a lower velocity than the last, so it's trajectory will be different.  Does the mount compensate for that?  If so, how with these tremendous rates of fire which are claimed?

How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

zenrat

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on December 07, 2014, 01:12:21 PM
Quote from: zenrat on December 06, 2014, 11:06:35 PM
Quote from: NARSES2 on December 06, 2014, 05:44:36 AM
Was Schrage Musik only used on night fighters ?...
I recall reading something similar (but obviously firing downwards) for anti tank use.
Vertically mounted rockets in the rear fuselage of (IIRC) an Hs-129 that were triggered automatically when the plane flew over a large metal object like a tank.

One of the systems was the SG113, shown on page 1 of the thread:
http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,19887.msg227217.html#msg227217

There were similar multi-barrel systems using 30mm MK108 rounds for air-to-air (forward or vertical firing)
and air-to-ground.

That's the one.  Thanks Jon.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..