Hawker Cyclone Mk.1a

Started by novis2, February 28, 2013, 08:54:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

novis2


JayBee

Nice model.
However it does require a good backstory!  :wacko:

Keep up the good work,

Jim
Alle kunst ist umsunst wenn ein engel auf das zundloch brunzt!!

Sic biscuitus disintegratum!

Cats are not real. 
They are just physical manifestations of collisions between enigma & conundrum particles.

Any aircraft can be improved by giving it a SHARKMOUTH!

PantherG

So...comrade Novis have ERROR in name of plane....
Originally this is a Scottish Aviation SA-109 E-3 "Knivesmith"....  ;D

JayBee

Love that comment to bits!!!!!!
Alle kunst ist umsunst wenn ein engel auf das zundloch brunzt!!

Sic biscuitus disintegratum!

Cats are not real. 
They are just physical manifestations of collisions between enigma & conundrum particles.

Any aircraft can be improved by giving it a SHARKMOUTH!

Rheged

Quote from: JayBee on February 28, 2013, 10:20:30 AM
Nice model.
However it does require a good backstory!  :wacko:

Keep up the good work,

Jim

I'm sure that there's a good backstory on its way.   If it's as good as the modelling, I will be most impressed!
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

Captain Canada

Great job. That model looks awesome !

:cheers:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

andrewj

Quote from: NARSES2 on March 01, 2013, 12:52:44 AM
Nice. Which kit is it ?

Is there a kit for the Hawker Cyclone Mk1a ?, :thumbsup: looks like the airfix 109 to me.

Andrew

PantherG

Comrade Novis use new Airfix kit..... ;)

NARSES2

Quote from: PantherG on March 01, 2013, 05:04:33 AM
Comrade Novis use new Airfix kit..... ;)

Thought it was. I'm building one at the moment, nice kit
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.