avatar_seadude

Displaying models at contests.

Started by seadude, September 01, 2015, 07:22:21 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

seadude

This topic isn't necessarily about the model itself, but rather more about how it is displayed.

What are the limitations on displaying models at contests? Are there any IPMS rules on size and shape, etc. of a display?

How do most modelers like to display their models: On a stand? On a mirror surface to show the underside? On a scenic diorama base with groundwork? On a wood plaque base? Or something else?

How important or unimportant is information next to a model such as specifications, pictures, etc., etc. ?

As an example, I'm currently building all the aircraft related to the DARPA XST Stealth Fighter competition from the 1970's. This includes the Lockheed "Hopeless Diamond", Northrop XST, Lockheed "Have Blue" prototype, and the final F-117 aircraft. All four aircraft are in 1/144 scale and I'm trying to figure out a way to display them and/or put some sort of informational text next to them for people to read. Any suggestions?
Modeling isn't just about how good the gluing or painting, etc. looks. It's also about how creative and imaginative you can be with a subject.
My modeling philosophy is: Don't build what everyone else has done. Build instead what nobody has seen or done before.

Captain Canada

No idea, but I like the idea of having a tarmac type base that`s cut open to reveal a mirror so people can see underneath Especially if these stealthy types have an open weapons bay or somat of interest underneath.

:cheers:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

PR19_Kit

In IPMS UK there are no rules about a model should be displayed.

It's up to the modeller if it's mounted on a base, a mirror, a stand or standing on its wheels or floats (or skis even...) IIRC there are rules about how complex a base may be before it's classified as a diorama, and then it's moved to a different class.

Other IPMS branches may have their own rules of course, as they are allowed to do.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Thorvic

Skunkworks inside hanger for top brass display with a curtain as a backdrop and lots of security and MPs, or Area 51 at mouth of hanger ?
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

NARSES2

Quote from: PR19_Kit on September 01, 2015, 09:47:48 AM
IIRC there are rules about how complex a base may be before it's classified as a diorama, and then it's moved to a different class.


There are Kit and it's interesting. Their was a winner a year or so back - a crashed and wrecked aircraft that had been discovered years after the event (I think anyway) - that caused some controversy as many argued it was indeed a diorama. Heard some of the "discussion" whilst looking at it  :blink: In my view it was a diorama as the aircraft looked more like an archaeological dig, but that's just my opinion.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Rick Lowe

Our rules state a model must be secured to the base, and if there's more than one or two figures around an aircraft it's edging into Diorama territory, but other than that, it's pretty open...

FWIW

Cheers