A-26 Invader in RAAF Service

Started by rickshaw, October 27, 2017, 06:06:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

A-26 Invader in RAAF service

The Douglas A-26 Invader (designated B-26 between 1948 and 1965) is a twin-engined light bomber and ground attack aircraft. Built by Douglas Aircraft Company during World War II, the Invader also saw service during several major Cold War conflicts. A limited number of highly modified United States Air Force aircraft served in Southeast Asia until 1969. It was a fast aircraft capable of carrying a large bomb load. A range of guns could be fitted to produce a formidable ground-attack aircraft.

A re-designation of the type from A-26 to B-26 led to confusion with the Martin B-26 Marauder, which first flew in November 1940, some 20 months before the Douglas design's maiden flight. Although both types were powered by the widely used Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp eighteen-cylinder, double-row radial engine, they were completely different and separate designs — the Martin bomber originated in 1939, with more than twice as many Marauders (nearly 5,300) produced in comparison to the Douglas design.

USAAF service
The Pacific

The Douglas company began delivering the production model A-26B to the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) in August 1943 with the new bomber first seeing action with the Fifth Air Force in the Southwest Pacific theatre on 23 June 1944, when Japanese-held islands near Manokwari were attacked. The pilots in the 3rd Bomb Group's 13th Squadron, "The Grim Reapers", who received the first four A-26s for evaluation, found the view from the cockpit to be restricted by the engines and thus inadequate for low-level attack. General George Kenney, commander of the Far East Air Forces stated that, "We do not want the A-26 under any circumstances as a replacement for anything."

Until changes could be made, the 3d Bomb Group requested additional Douglas A-20 Havocs, although both types were used in composite flights. The 319th Bomb Group worked up on the A-26 in March 1945, joining the initial 3rd BG, with the 319th flying until 12 August 1945. The A-26 operations wound down in mid-August 1945 with only a few dozen missions flown. Several of the A-20 and B-25 AAF units in the Pacific received the A-26 for trials, in limited quantities.

Europe

Douglas needed better results from the Invader's second combat test, so A-26s began arriving in Europe in late September 1944 for assignment to the Ninth Air Force. The initial deployment involved 18 aircraft and crews assigned to the 553d Squadron of the 386th Bomb Group. This unit flew its first mission on 6 September 1944. No aircraft were lost on the eight test missions, and the Ninth Air Force announced that it was happy to replace all of its A-20s and B-26s with the A-26 Invader.

The first group to fully convert to the A-26B was 416th Bombardment Group with which it entered combat on 17 November, and the 409th Bombardment Group, whose A-26s became operational in late November.[16] Due to a shortage of A-26C variants, the groups flew a combined A-20/A-26 unit until deliveries of the glass-nose version caught up. Besides bombing and strafing, tactical reconnaissance and night interdiction missions were undertaken successfully. In contrast to the Pacific-based units, the A-26 was well received by pilots and crew alike, and by 1945, the 9th AF had flown 11,567 missions, dropping 18,054 tons of bombs, recording seven confirmed kills while losing 67 aircraft.

In Italy the Twelfth Air Force's 47th Bomb Group also received the A-26, starting in January 1945. They were used against German transport links, but also for direct support and interdiction against tanks and troop concentrations in the Po valley in the final campaigns in Italy.

RAAF service

Because of the USAAF's Pacific air force rejection, many A-26s were left in aircraft parks in Australia after being delivered.  The RAAF discovered them, just at the time it was having considerable problems with the manufacture of the Mosquito.   The de Havilland aircraft, made of wood faired badly before the elements in the Tropics.  The glues used to bind it together started failing and aircraft were falling apart, literally rotting before their pilots' eyes.   The A-26's performance was nearly as good as the Mosquito's and made of metal, did not suffer the same problems.  So, late in 1944, the RAAF requested access to several Invaders for trials purposes.  The RAAF's pilots were initially reluctant, after hearing the bad stories of the USAAF's experience with the aircraft in action against the Japanese.  However, once they had tried it, they became enthusiastic.

The RAAF adopted the Invader as a replacement to the Mosquito.  It was durable and it was fast and manoeuvrable and carried an excellent war load.  Used as a night time intruder, the squadrons that adopted the aircraft found it an excellent mount.

At war's end, Australia found itself with a considerable surplus resulted from it's positive Lend-Lease ratio caused by it's supply of large quantities of grain and other agricultural products.  After negotiations with the US Government it found itself heir to a large quantity of surplus US war materiale'.   This included several thousand of the latest USAAF aircraft, including a large quantity of A-26 Invaders.   Sufficient to keep several squadrons supplied with aircraft for some time to come.

The A-26 lasted in RAAF service until the end of the 1950s, when the last were finally retired, replaced by Canberra jet bombers.   The A-26 served not only in the closing stages of the Pacific War but also in the Occupation of Japan and the Korean War.   It's extended range allowed it to loiter for long periods over North Korea, interdicting the Communists' logistics effort.   One was shot down in the early days of the war by a MiG-15 fighter.  However, after they were switched to night time attacks only, all possible involvement with Communist fighters ended.






The Model

The model is the venerable 1/72 Airfix kit, hand painted in deep foliage green.  It has had it's gun turrets removed to save weight and because there was little likelihood of them being much use against any intercepting fighters at night.   It was brush painted and the markings are from an old ESCI Mosquito decal set, depicting a fighter from 1 Squadron RAAF.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

PR19_Kit

That does look good in Oz Green Brian.  :thumbsup:

Did the RAAF really have any A-26s? IIRC the RAF trialled a couple of them, but never had them in any numbers.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

I like that Brian  :thumbsup:

Kit, after testing of 2 USAAF examples by A & AEE in 1944 the R.A.F. was allocated 140. Only 2 were delivered before the War's end and immediately returned. The RAAF didn't get any, but if the War had continued ?  ;)
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

rickshaw

No, Kit, we didn't get any A-26s in RL, Kit.  The RAAF had their heart set on the Mosquito but their were problems with the glue chosen and the wooden structure wasn't really up to service in the Tropics.   It never really entered RAAF service until the last year of the war and never really satisfied the belief in it.  The A-26 however wasn't popular as my history says, with the USAAF in the Pacific.  So, along with the truth about us ending up one of the few creditors of the Lend-Lease system (we gave massive quantities of grain and other agriculture products to Europe as the war ended and just after - basically we fed Europe while it was setting itself back on it's feet) it was just an obvious way for the US and the West to pay off it's debt - by giving us all the surplus stock already present in Oz.   :thumbsup:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on October 27, 2017, 07:09:38 AM

...... basically we fed Europe while it was setting itself back on it's feet


That would have been me then, thanks very much.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on October 27, 2017, 08:37:47 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on October 27, 2017, 07:09:38 AM

...... basically we fed Europe while it was setting itself back on it's feet


That would have been me then, thanks very much.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

That's OK.  Do you still need the Lard for Victory?*



*Obscure reference to the original comic strip version of Barry McKenzie... ;)
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

zenrat

Looks great Brian.
:thumbsup:

What else did we get?  B36s? ;D
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

TheChronicOne

I like it!! That's a good write up there, too. I like how they were pretty much "rescued" from demise.
-Sprues McDuck-

DogfighterZen

"Sticks and stones may break some bones but a 3.57's gonna blow your damn head off!!"

rickshaw

Quote from: zenrat on October 28, 2017, 02:25:35 AM
Looks great Brian.
:thumbsup:

What else did we get?  B36s? ;D

Nope.  Too late.  You'll just have to wait and see...   ;)
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

comrade harps

Whatever.

Old Wombat

I've already said I like it over on BtS but it's growing on me even more! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

zenrat

Quote from: rickshaw on October 29, 2017, 04:22:56 AM
Quote from: zenrat on October 28, 2017, 02:25:35 AM
Looks great Brian.
:thumbsup:

What else did we get?  B36s? ;D

Nope.  Too late.  You'll just have to wait and see...   ;)

Gives me an idea for my C-97.  Other than zenrat industries that is.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

rickshaw

Quote from: zenrat on October 30, 2017, 02:46:45 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on October 29, 2017, 04:22:56 AM
Quote from: zenrat on October 28, 2017, 02:25:35 AM
Looks great Brian.
:thumbsup:

What else did we get?  B36s? ;D

Nope.  Too late.  You'll just have to wait and see...   ;)

Gives me an idea for my C-97.  Other than zenrat industries that is.

Well, if you extend the war by 12-24 months, it could be included...   ;)
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.