avatar_Daryl J.

Fairey Swordfish

Started by Daryl J., October 29, 2010, 02:37:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tigercat

But the ones available in Britain were a lot shorter . So you'd need the Swordfish Triplane to land on HMS Stoat , HMS Ferret and HMS Mink

Old Wombat

As the Swordfish would take off in a stiff breeze as it was, I don't think a triplane version is required. :unsure:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

PR19_Kit

#32
At an RAF BoB display at Abingdon many years ago, the FAA Historical flight bought their first Swordfish along, the one coded 5A back then, and at first they reckoned it was too windy for it to fly.

Later on in the afternoon, after they'd had a noggin or two I suspect, they figured it wasn't as breezy as previously so they took 5A out. Its take-off run was about four fuselage lengths and the climb-out was about as steep as a Harrier's! To further show their prowess they then flew a 'reverse loop' effectively, by throttling back at the top of the climb and tracking backwards across the airfield before throttling down a bit more and landing, also in a ridiculously short distance.  :o

They got louder applause than any of the fast jets or the assault demo by Argosies and Andovers earlier.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

kitnut617

Quote from: PR19_Kit on January 10, 2018, 03:09:46 PM
At an RAF BoB display at Abingdon many years ago, the FAA Historical flight bought their first Swordfish along, the one coded 5A back then, and at first they reckoned it was too windy for it to fly.

Later on in the afternoon, after they'd had a noggin or two I suspect, they figured it wasn't as breezy as previously so they took 5A out. Its take-off run was about four fuselage lengths and the climb-out was about as steep as a Harrier's! To further show their prowess they then flew a 'reverse loop' effectively, by throttling back at the top of the climb and tracking backwards across the airfield before throttling down a bit more and landing, also in a ridiculously shirt distance.  :o

They got louder applause than any of the fast jets or the assault demo by Argosies and Andovers earlier.  :thumbsup:

When was that Kit? I was in the UK in 2002 and went to the Duxford September air show and saw a Swordfish flying, got some nice pics of it but it was before my digital camera days, used an OM10 back then.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

PR19_Kit

It must have been in the early 70s some time Robert. I'd just started at BR and came back down for the occasion as I used to live there.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

I know I've said this before but dad said that during his time aboard an escort carrier one TAG on a Swordfish related the story of how in a headwind they'd been overtaken by a seagull and that on a couple of occasions when a Stringbag was trying to land in a stiff breeze most of the deck/gun crews were required to run out and help pull it down  :angel: There are also stories where Stringbag pilots have sworn that in some conditions they were going backwards !
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

rickshaw

Quote from: NARSES2 on January 12, 2018, 06:18:05 AM
I know I've said this before but dad said that during his time aboard an escort carrier one TAG on a Swordfish related the story of how in a headwind they'd been overtaken by a seagull and that on a couple of occasions when a Stringbag was trying to land in a stiff breeze most of the deck/gun crews were required to run out and help pull it down  :angel: There are also stories where Stringbag pilots have sworn that in some conditions they were going backwards !

While many disparage the Swordfish as "old fashioned" what has to be remembered is that it was operational for the length of the war, from start to finish.   Eric Browne had in one of his books a small table which compared the tonnage of ships sunk between the Swordfish and other aircraft and the Swordfish came well out on top.   He also recounted how he was tasked to test it's manoeuvrability against fighters (as if no other pilot had discovered that!) and he took on Spitfires and easily beat them apparently.  When lightly loaded, the Swordfish was apparently quite a performer, as Kit's tale recounts.  I think a Hercules engined version would have done quite well, if they'd ever bothered with it, instead of wasting their time on the Albacore.

Speaking of which, I wonder why there never has been a 1/72 injected moulded model of that much neglected aircraft?  The Albacore was quite a good looker, if a desultory performer.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Quote from: rickshaw on January 12, 2018, 05:50:18 PM

While many disparage the Swordfish as "old fashioned" what has to be remembered is that it was operational for the length of the war, from start to finish.   Eric Browne had in one of his books a small table which compared the tonnage of ships sunk between the Swordfish and other aircraft and the Swordfish came well out on top.   

Absolutely, believe you me I'm a fan of the old girl (love the way the AG on the FAA display aircraft flies the White Ensign and stands to attention in the fly past  ;D) and my dad's stories were always told with a sense of respect for the crews and affection for the old girl herself.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

zenrat

Sounds like a triplane Swordfish would take off if someone sighed heavily in it's general direction.
Would you add the third wing above or below?
I'd favour putting it underneath with the wheels (or floats) mounted directly to it.  Sort of like the Heyford's lower wing.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

One mounted underneath as per the Heyford as you say, or the Bristol Fighter, a mid fuselage one and then the upper one ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Rheged

In admiral Cunningham's autobiography, he mentions reading a decrypt of an Afrika Corps signal in which they report that the British are using hovering helicopters as precision bombers.  His response is "That would be a Swordfish flying into a stiff breeze"
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

PR19_Kit

Quote from: NARSES2 on January 13, 2018, 02:24:33 AM

Absolutely, believe you me I'm a fan of the old girl (love the way the AG on the FAA display aircraft flies the White Ensign and stands to attention in the fly past  ;D) and my dad's stories were always told with a sense of respect for the crews and affection for the old girl herself.


One of my Field Service Engineers (who's name was Ted Heath, and he was neither an ex-Prime Minister, a band leader or a sailor.....) WAS that guy holding up the White Ensign during the time he was Chief Air Artificer on the FAA Historical Flight!

Ted said it was a horrendous job as the Ensign was so large that it almost hauled him out of the cockpit, belts notwithstanding, and some time after his tenure of the post they fitted a tube at the aft end of the cockpit into which the Ensign fitted, thus off loading the AG.

His comment on learning of this was 'It's all gone to the dogs since the old days!'  ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on January 13, 2018, 10:05:10 AM
His comment on learning of this was 'It's all gone to the dogs since the old days!'  ;D

Never a truer word said.  These young whipper snippers...  :thumbsup:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

dogsbody

QuoteSpeaking of which, I wonder why there never has been a 1/72 injected moulded model of that much neglected aircraft?  The Albacore was quite a good looker, if a desultory performer.


I have this short-run Pegasus kit from the late 80's, if I remember it right.




Chris
"What young man could possibly be bored
with a uniform to wear,
a fast aeroplane to fly,
and something to shoot at?"

zenrat

And if the Albacore had been a success then all the old hands would have said "cockpit? you lot have it easy..."
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..