avatar_Ian the Kiwi Herder

F7F (P-65) Tigercat

Started by Ian the Kiwi Herder, March 14, 2008, 10:45:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

KJ_Lesnick

#120
everybody

I'm curious when the US Army procured the XP-50?


tomo pauk

QuoteNot sure what is the issue
A communications gulf: I explained the issue would have -- for WHIF purposes -- to have had the aircraft fitted with a twin-stage engine from the outset, not modifying an extant engine installed.
QuoteI agree with proposal to have 2-stage engines if we want the new variant to be great performer also at 25000-30000 ft.
Which is basically the goal
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

kitnut617

Quote from: KJ_Lesnick on February 01, 2016, 12:48:30 PM
everybody

I'm curious when the US Army procured the XP-50?

I found the answer to this very easily on the internet --- try looking yourself for a change --
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

kitnut617

Quote from: tomo pauk on February 01, 2016, 01:37:38 AM
Not sure what is the issue -

Don't worry, she'll invent one ---
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

KJ_Lesnick

I know this is an old post, but it's still something that interests me: I'm kind of interested that the Grumman 46 started before the USAAF procured the XP-50.  I'm curious if this was enough to throw a monkey-wrench into the idea?

Regardless, I find it fascinating that the hydraulic clutching used by the R-2800 didn't seem to mean the same thing as the V-1710's: I'm surprised they wouldn't jump on the possibility of variable-speed off the bat.

I'm also curious how a turbo would have worked if the turbine was pointed straight aft with the exhaust heading through it like on the P-67 Bat.  It would provide the benefits of a turbo and thrust...
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

ysi_maniac

Recce carrier borne USMC Grumman Tigercat.

Will die without understanding this world.

NARSES2

Intriguing mix of parts  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Dizzyfugu

I like the look of it, even though I have doubts concerning the landing gear, esp. the front wheel well and the observer's station. The arrester hook appears quite short, too? Looks like a cool (and massive!) 1945 design, though.  :thumbsup:


NARSES2

Paired engines and T tail  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

perttime

Secretprojects has a fuzzy pic that seems to have an early F7F or XP-65 mockup:
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/grumman-f7f-very-early-model-pics.7404/#post-619266

You cannot view this attachment.
 
I like the more bubble shaped canopy.

jcf

Quote from: perttime on September 02, 2023, 10:57:27 PMSecretprojects has a fuzzy pic that seems to have an early F7F or XP-65 mockup:
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/grumman-f7f-very-early-model-pics.7404/#post-619266

You cannot view this attachment.
 
I like the more bubble shaped canopy.
It's possibly before they raised the decking behind the pilot to accommodate a reserve fuel tank.
This proved serendipitous when they decided to make a two-seat nightfighter, the radar operator
position went in where the tank had been installed.

Rick Lowe

And avoided an Hornet-style pimple...