avatar_The Big Gimper

1965 RCAF CUH-1D Huey

Started by The Big Gimper, October 17, 2018, 12:35:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Big Gimper

Here is the partner in crime to my RCN CUH-1D Huey.

The CAF (post unification) purchased 10 UH-1Hs originally designed CUH-1H but became the CH-118. They only saw service with the Air Force.  This build is base on an earlier purchase (1965-ish) before unification where the RCN and RCAF get Hueys and they are painted in the service current colours.

This is 1/72 ECSI UH-1D. Nice little kit but real pain to build given all small and clear parts.  There are 21+parts for the interior. Only 20 Parts for the air frame.

This scheme is based on the CH-113 Labrador as seen in 1965-68. Note the new Canadian Flag on the tail.  Since there are no known RCAF CUH-1D decal sheets, I used the Leading Edge H-21/H-34 sheet. I had to cut the lightning bolt decal into 5 pieces. Did I curse when building this kit? Absolutely yes. The upper side of the blades were grey. I'm quite chuffed as to how it turned out. Painted with a hairy stick.


RCAF-CUH-1D-03
by Big Gimper, on Flickr


RCAF-CUH-1D-02
by Big Gimper, on Flickr


RCAF-CUH-1D-01
by Big Gimper, on Flickr


Two-Hueys-01
by Big Gimper, on Flickr
Work In Progress ::

Lots of stuff

PR19_Kit

VERY smart indeed!  :thumbsup:

Your work on the lightning stripe was well worth it.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

zenrat

Nice.    :thumbsup:

I built the Italeri/Tamiya 1/72 Huey.  Went together well.  I'd like to build more.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.