Super Clunk.

[Rory]

What to do with a kit you have dragged around several shows trying to sell but having no luck.

Whiff it!





1/72 Phantom bits fit quite well on a 1/48 CF 100 Mk VI  

[B777LR]

     

[wolfik]

what to do?hmhmm....
but yours looks very well!
(source.LUFT46 Page)

[ysi_maniac]

It is cool B) . Perhaps a small fix in tail.  

[Rory]

It is cool B) . Perhaps a small fix in tail.

Please tell me more about this little fix.

[Captain Canada]

Wow....is that ever frickin' nice ! Sure looks the part. I want one...now ! What did you do ? Just angle the wings where they meet the fuselage to get the sweep ? Same for the tail ? Looks awesome..... I love it !

About the only thing I'd change a bit is the nose...somehow looks too pointy ? Really does update the look of the bird, tho ! You gonna make her CDN ? Need any decals ?

   

[ysi_maniac]

It is cool B) . Perhaps a small fix in tail.

Please tell me more about this little fix.

Tail fin: straight leading edge

Tail plane: leading and trailing edges in similar angles that wings

Is my bad English clear?


EDIT: I love the nose as is.  

[Rory]

Basicaly yes.

20mm of each trailing edge, cut wingtips to match ,add Phantom nose , flattened at the point top and bottom (F20 (?) ish?)and exhast's. Re fueling probe is bent tubing . It is going to be Canadian, probably 2 tone gray(soft splinter?) maybe an orange tail.

Phantom tanks under the fusilage, 4,maybe 6.

Not sure about anything else.

[Rory]

It is cool B) . Perhaps a small fix in tail.

Please tell me more about this little fix.

Tail fin: straight leading edge

Tail plane: leading and trailing edges in similar angles that wings

Is my bad English clear?


EDIT: I love the nose as is.

Yes I agree with the tail thing, I cocked up  ( made a mistake of) the angles.

I can't be arsed to do anything about it (yet).

[rallymodeller]

OH HELL YEAH!

Now that's what I'm talking about right there!    

Sorta fancies some of the later Clunk proposals, like the Mk. 6 and Mk. 7/8 high altitude ones. The "long-wing"  Mk. 8 high-altitude proposal had a 35°-swept horizontal tail in addition to the 63' wingspan and Orpheus booster jets in the wingtips.  


One of the projects on my "Must Do Soon" list is a C-103 Super Canuck:



although I'll probably revert to the normal Mk 4/Mk. 5 nose. I just like it better.

So what squadron's it gonna be in, Rory? 425 had the best nacelle markings...

[Archibald]

What to do with a kit you have dragged around several shows trying to sell but having no luck.

Whiff it!





1/72 Phantom bits fit quite well on a 1/48 CF 100 Mk VI

Very cool! Do you realise that it looks like those Supersonic Buccaneer proposals of the 60's ? (Blackburn P.150)!
Nicely done! 'm glad you couldn't seel it    

[SPINNERS]

Cool! Let's see it in camo and RAF Germany markings.

[Rory]

OH HELL YEAH!

Now that's what I'm talking about right there!    

Sorta fancies some of the later Clunk proposals, like the Mk. 6 and Mk. 7/8 high altitude ones. The "long-wing"  Mk. 8 high-altitude proposal had a 35°-swept horizontal tail in addition to the 63' wingspan and Orpheus booster jets in the wingtips. 



So what squadron's it gonna be in, Rory? 425 had the best nacelle markings...

I didn't know there was any other versions !

Not a clue about Canadian squadrons, markings or much else to be honest

Is the tail better now?

[Captain Canada]

Is the tail better now?

NOOOOOO !

I liked it better the first time...looked super-sleek like that !

And NATO camo would look superb on her........from the 1960s !

 

[GeorgeC]

Clunks are neither good or bad,  super or not super, they are just clunks - no more no less

Can u do them with a hook?