avatar_upnorth

Fisher P-75 Eagle

Started by upnorth, January 18, 2008, 07:10:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions

NARSES2

#30
June 17, 2015, 06:22:07 AM
Oh that is gorgeous  :wub:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Dizzyfugu

#31
June 17, 2015, 06:30:51 AM
Definitively!  :thumbsup:

dogsbody

#32
June 17, 2015, 09:55:02 AM
Sa-weet!
"What young man could possibly be bored
with a uniform to wear,
a fast aeroplane to fly,
and something to shoot at?"

PACOPEPE

#33
June 17, 2015, 01:16:40 PM
Thanks everybody.

Dizzyfugu: do you understand now why i like your "Rikugun Ki 121"?. I love whiffies; half history, half imagination.

All the best,
Fran

zenrat

#34
June 18, 2015, 03:20:11 AM
Excellent.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Tophe

#35
June 18, 2015, 06:31:56 AM
I love this P-75-II, thanks a lot! Better than History! :wub: :thumbsup: :bow:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Captain Canada

#36
June 18, 2015, 06:45:09 AM
Is that ever nice...very clean build and a super sleek looking bird !

:wub:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

Dork the kit slayer

#37
June 18, 2015, 06:45:25 AM
Well good !!! :bow: :bow: :bow: :cheers:
Im pink therefore Im Spam...and not allowed out without an adult    

       http://plasticnostalgia.blogspot.co.uk/

Dizzyfugu

#38
June 18, 2015, 06:54:16 AM
Quote from: PACOPEPE on June 17, 2015, 01:16:40 PM
Thanks everybody.

Dizzyfugu: do you understand now why i like your "Rikugun Ki 121"?. I love whiffies; half history, half imagination.

All the best,
Fran

Thank you. But your work is also outstanding, I like the concept a lot.  :thumbsup:

Tophe

#39
June 18, 2015, 07:13:16 AM
And the 4-engine Twin-Eagle was sexy too...:

Thanks!
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

KJ_Lesnick

#40
June 18, 2015, 05:39:44 PM
1. What caused Fischer to miscalculate the CG of the plane?
2. What shape would the plane have taken if the CG was more practically arranged?
That being said, I'd like to remind everybody in a manner reminiscent of the SNL bit on Julian Assange, that no matter how I die: It was murder (even if there was a suicide note or a video of me peacefully dying in my sleep); should I be framed for a criminal offense or disappear, you know to blame.

wuzak

#41
June 18, 2015, 10:08:39 PM
KJ,

No 'C' in Fisher.

1. Arithmetic
2. The same, but different. Likely would involve just moving bits around slightly, like the wing forward or back.

PACOPEPE

#42
June 18, 2015, 11:54:09 PM
Quote from: Tophe on June 18, 2015, 07:13:16 AM
And the 4-engine Twin-Eagle was sexy too...:

Thanks!
Thanks Tophe, it´s a great honor. Ah!, it´s 8-engine.  ;D

wuzak

#43
June 18, 2015, 11:57:37 PM
Pacopepe, I like how you've done the rear props. Looks like they were meant to be there.

Looks like it would make a nice pusher only aircraft too. Then the nose could be loaded with guns or radar.

PACOPEPE

#44
June 19, 2015, 12:09:01 AM
Quote from: wuzak on June 18, 2015, 11:57:37 PM
Pacopepe, I like how you've done the rear props. Looks like they were meant to be there.

Looks like it would make a nice pusher only aircraft too. Then the nose could be loaded with guns or radar.
Thanks. Yes, the push version would be very interesting too.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4
User actions