avatar_AeroplaneDriver

Nimrod MRA.4 a future Whif?

Started by AeroplaneDriver, March 26, 2008, 09:24:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

kitnut617

Quote from: Hobbes on October 19, 2010, 11:29:45 PM
Quote from: kitnut617 on October 19, 2010, 02:30:21 PM
Thing is Jon, would they have gone with an under fuselage pannier like they stuck on the Comet ?

But now I've got a reason to go get one of these ----  ;D :lol:

http://www.welshmodels.co.uk/MJA72-5.html

Buying a £100 kit for this? Brave man!

I'd just butcher a Revell A320 instead.

I don't think the Revell A320 is 1/72 scale Hobbes --
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

PR19_Kit

Robert,

Quote from: kitnut617 on October 20, 2010, 05:57:58 AM
I don't think the Revell A320 is 1/72 scale Hobbes --

So that's a problem for a man of your undoubted modelling talents?  ;D ;)
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Spey_Phantom

i think the MPA320 is a good idea, but the A320 is only a regional aircraft with a short range/loiter time.
wouldnt it be better to use the A330 or Boeing 767 airframe  :-\

to bad the Atantique III (AKA: the Dassault/Breguet Altantic NG) is no longer being offered, would have been a nice interim sollution.
the RAF could also go cheap and Lease ex-USN P-3 Orions  :blink:
on the bench:

-all kinds of things.

kitnut617

Quote from: PR19_Kit on October 20, 2010, 10:34:02 AM
Robert,

Quote from: kitnut617 on October 20, 2010, 05:57:58 AM
I don't think the Revell A320 is 1/72 scale Hobbes --

So that's a problem for a man of your undoubted modelling talents?  ;D ;)

Flattery will get you everywhere -----  :lol:

But if I was to 'butcher' a kit, I'd get the 1/72 Welshmodel A320 but chop up one of my Nimrods to get the pannier for it.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Hobbes

Quote from: Nils on October 20, 2010, 12:24:06 PM
i think the MPA320 is a good idea, but the A320 is only a regional aircraft with a short range/loiter time.
wouldnt it be better to use the A330 or Boeing 767 airframe  :-\


Actually, if you go with the A319, you can get the range up to 12000 km.

anthonyp

Heh, I'm actually looking at the Embraer ERJ-170 and ERJ-190 series as small MPA's.  I've got a few in the stash I'm going to have fun with.
I exist to pi$$ others off!!!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man

McColm

#36
The Atlantic MK3, P-7 and Nimrod MK4

Hobbes

Do you have a larger version of that Nimrod pic?

rickshaw

Quote from: GTX on March 29, 2008, 12:01:53 PM
Quoteortuitously there will, at that time, be an abdundance of ex-USN P-3s available...

Except that their fatigue lives will be very high thus requiring a complete rebuild to be useful.

Regards,

Greg

I was just about to mention that.  Corrosion is also a big problem for the P-3.  I'd be very careful purchasing secondhand ones in case you end up with a KANIMBLA or a MANOORA (both ex-USN LPA ships which were notorious.  When purchased second-hand they were found to have extensive rust through the super-structure, requiring an expensive and length rebuild before the RAN could put them into service.  The USN knew about the rust but failed to inform the RAN and the RAN failed to, as one government minister famously put it, "kick the tyres" before buying them).

How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

kitnut617

Quote from: kitnut617 on October 20, 2010, 01:27:57 PM
Quote from: PR19_Kit on October 20, 2010, 10:34:02 AM
Robert,

Quote from: kitnut617 on October 20, 2010, 05:57:58 AM
I don't think the Revell A320 is 1/72 scale Hobbes --

So that's a problem for a man of your undoubted modelling talents?  ;D ;)

Flattery will get you everywhere -----  :lol:

But if I was to 'butcher' a kit, I'd get the 1/72 Welshmodel A320 but chop up one of my Nimrods to get the pannier for it.

Giving this a bit more thought, I could use the Nimrod wings and attach them to a Transall ------- or a Belfast   :wacko:
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

ChernayaAkula

Quote from: kitnut617 on October 21, 2010, 10:43:53 AM
<...> I could use the Nimrod wings and attach them to a Transall ------- or a Belfast   :wacko:

Whoa!  :o Sounds awesome!  :bow:
Cheers,
Moritz


Must, then, my projects bend to the iron yoke of a mechanical system? Is my soaring spirit to be chained down to the snail's pace of matter?

PR19_Kit

Quote from: kitnut617 on October 21, 2010, 10:43:53 AM
Giving this a bit more thought, I could use the Nimrod wings and attach them to a Transall ------- or a Belfast   :wacko:

Nah, put them on a Beverley. Now THERE'S as under fuselage pod for you..........  :lol:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

kitnut617

That's where I got the idea, only I don't have anything remotely like the AW 681.  I think the Transall comes close though, the Belfast being a bit too big I think.
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

anthonyp

Looks like a mutant, streamlined YC-15.  It gives me (bad) ideas.
I exist to pi$$ others off!!!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man

Thorvic

Transall was used on the 2nd one Duncan as it had a better shape to it

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships