Main Menu
avatar_Jschmus

A400M Rollout

Started by Jschmus, June 26, 2008, 06:12:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jschmus

Here's another one of those "Wish I'd taken it" shots:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Airbus-Industrie/Airbus-A400M/1366706/L/

At first, I dismissed this project as just a "bigger C-130", but it's nice to see the actual airplane.
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."-Alan Moore

Captain Canada

Oh yeah....nice find, Jay ! That thing is beautiful ! I want one......or two ! I wish Canada would buy some !

:wub:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

Scooterman

Looks like a Herc and a C-17 had a night alone.......

anthonyp

Where are the WINGLETS?!  It's missing winglets!!  It's not finished without the winglets.   :lol:
I exist to pi$$ others off!!!
My categorized models directory on my site.
My site (currently with no model links).
"Build what YOU like, the way YOU want to." - a wise man

MAD

That air refueling probe looks hideous! :banghead:
It does the aerodynamic looks an injustice, as well as looking like an after thought!

Hay and why does it not utilize winglets?

M.A.D

B777LR

Quote from: Scooterman on June 26, 2008, 07:10:07 PM
Looks like a Herc and a C-17 had a night alone.......

I think it looks like an An-70 :wub: :wub: :wub:

I like it :wub: Out with the 50 year old C-130, in with this new baby :thumbsup:

Hobbes


nev

Quote from: B777LR on June 26, 2008, 11:48:22 PM
I think it looks like an An-70 :wub: :wub: :wub:

So do the Russians - I read some time ago complaints about the west plagiarising Soviet designs  :banghead: Only so many ways you can design a tactical airlifter.....

Still, does this mean that a pan-European military project is actually - gasp! - on time!?  :o
Between almost-true and completely-crazy, there is a rainbow of nice shades - Tophe


Sales of Airfix kits plummeted in the 1980s, and GCSEs had to be made easier as a result - James May

Archibald

Quote from: MAD on June 26, 2008, 11:38:00 PM
That air refueling probe looks hideous! :banghead:
It does the aerodynamic looks an injustice, as well as looking like an after thought!

Hay and why does it not utilize winglets?

M.A.D


Totally agree with this statement. Did they borrowed it from a Gloster Javelin ?  :rolleyes:

Got a strange feeling when I saw this pic. Probably because from seven years now we only saw the A400M as a CGI dream, nt a true machine.

Goodbye Transalls!
King Arthur: Can we come up and have a look?
French Soldier: Of course not. You're English types.
King Arthur: What are you then?
French Soldier: I'm French. Why do you think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king?

Well regardless I would rather take my chance out there on the ocean, that to stay here and die on this poo-hole island spending the rest of my life talking to a gosh darn VOLLEYBALL.

Thorvic

Well i think it looks like the HS-681 Aldershot and thats over 40 yrs old !!!

Not sure why people are comenting on the refuelling probe, the previous types its intended to replace are worse, at least that was designed with an optional refuelling probe positioned in the only place where the pilot can see it well enougth to guide it into the recepticle.

G
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

B777LR

Quote from: nev on June 27, 2008, 01:18:58 AM
Still, does this mean that a pan-European military project is actually - gasp! - on time!?  :o

Well, in that case, the 787 must be ahead of schedule... (wasnt the A-400M predecesor supposed to fly in 1993?!?)

Spey_Phantom

wow, what a plane, kinda looks like a C-17 with the nose of a C-27.
Belgium will be getting 7 of them  :wub:
on the bench:

-all kinds of things.

kitnut617

I think it looks really neat ---- is that my eyes or do the two engines on each wing have the props rotating in different directions?
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

Mossie

I'd go with you there Robert, the curvature of the blades is definatley in opposite directions on each prop.  Rumour is that Revell pretty much have a kit lined up already.
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

Hobbes

Quote from: Thorvic on June 27, 2008, 04:13:13 AM

Not sure why people are comenting on the refuelling probe, the previous types its intended to replace are worse, at least that was designed with an optional refuelling probe positioned in the only place where the pilot can see it well enougth to guide it into the recepticle.


Well, I'd have expected a retractable probe instead. But I guess the weight penalty of that would be worse than the drag of this fixed probe...