Sharkit

[The Wooksta!]

The engines for a start.  IIRC they weren't in the one I had circa 2001.

[renax]

Horten XVIIIa:

Madoc:

everything is different,
the new Fernbomber is completely retooled and the quality is far up,
compare to the first kit;

Cockpit is far better, detailes, there is a detailed gunner turret, the six complete engines, the A bombe...


http://renax-sharkit.blogspot.fr/2013/03/new-sharkit-horten-xviii.html

[renax]

For the Emerson turret kit,
you can see here:
http://www.sharkit.com/sharkit/emerson/emerson.htm
http://renax-sharkit.blogspot.fr/2013/03/panther-ff-3-emerson-turret.html
http://www.master194.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=74579&p=853806#p853806

[NARSES2]

That all looks really good 

[PR19_Kit]

That all looks really good 

And makes you wonder what else it could be mated to. Hunter? Swift?

[The Wooksta!]

Doubt the Swift.  That nose looks quite portly compared to the slim nose of the Swift.  Looks to be bigger than a Hunter nose too.

Except maybe a Matchbox one, but that's too big anyway.

[kitbasher]

Front end of an Airfix Vampire T.11?

[kitnut617]

Actually, I can see that on the front of a P.12 Canberra ----

[Rheged]

Perhaps an option on early versions of the D H 110?

[kitnut617]

Or Javelin

[PR19_Kit]

Or Javelin

NOW you're talking! I have a few in The Loft too.......... 

[Rheged]

Is it practical to use this device in the blunt end of a Vulcan??

[The Wooksta!]

No, because that's where the landing parachute is housed, along with all sorts of electronic black boxes.

[rickshaw]

Which could be relocated.  I could see it on the bum of a Valiant, quite easily.   Anyway, didn't the RAF consider a tail armament for the V-Bombers originally?

[Rheged]

Which could be relocated.  I could see it on the bum of a Valiant, quite easily.   Anyway, didn't the RAF consider a tail armament for the V-Bombers originally?

This was what I had in mind,  but it's a fair comment. Where, as an alternative,  would you put the braking parachute and electronic gubbins?