avatar_Weaver

Special Hobby

Started by Weaver, August 28, 2009, 01:09:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

Quote from: DogfighterZen on January 02, 2021, 08:04:58 AM
Just read through the earlier comments regarding the Xtrakit and SH F.22 kits and i'm a bit disappointed as i bought the Xtrakit a couple of days ago. :angry: If the kit is so flawed, it's perfect for what i have in mind and i will use it instead of the Airfix i have in the stash, which i thought was worse than the Xtrakit...I just need a few bits of that kit and for the price i paid for it, i think it's more than good enough for what i have in mind.

Quote from: ChernayaAkula on September 11, 2020, 02:10:08 PM
Quote from: Nils on September 11, 2020, 09:42:11 AM
a few days after KP Models announced a 1/72 injection mould version of the SIAI SF-260 Marchetti,
Special Hobby just announced they are doing the same thing, <...>

What are the odds? :banghead:
Couldn't one of them have gone for a Pilatus PC-7 or PC-9 instead?

I agree, those have been overlooked by the factories, i don't know of any kits of the two you mentioned. I'd love to build a PC-9 in Portuguese air force academy markings used on the TB-30 but maybe i'll go with the PC-21.

OzMods do PC-9.  There is a mob who advertise on EvilBay who do a PC-21.  Both are shortrun kits but quite well done apparently.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

DogfighterZen

Quote from: rickshaw on January 02, 2021, 04:59:49 PM
OzMods do PC-9.  There is a mob who advertise on EvilBay who do a PC-21.  Both are shortrun kits but quite well done apparently.

I didn't even know Ozmods had complete kits... :banghead:
Thanks, Rickshaw! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
The PC-21 is by 3D Blitz models and it looks very good: http://www.modellversium.de/kit/artikel.php?id=9638
"Sticks and stones may break some bones but a 3.57's gonna blow your damn head off!!"

rickshaw

Quote from: DogfighterZen on January 03, 2021, 01:56:28 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on January 02, 2021, 04:59:49 PM
OzMods do PC-9.  There is a mob who advertise on EvilBay who do a PC-21.  Both are shortrun kits but quite well done apparently.

I didn't even know Ozmods had complete kits... :banghead:
Thanks, Rickshaw! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
The PC-21 is by 3D Blitz models and it looks very good: http://www.modellversium.de/kit/artikel.php?id=9638

That's the one.

OzMods kits in 1/72
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

DogfighterZen

Quote from: rickshaw on January 03, 2021, 04:33:22 AM
Quote from: DogfighterZen on January 03, 2021, 01:56:28 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on January 02, 2021, 04:59:49 PM
OzMods do PC-9.  There is a mob who advertise on EvilBay who do a PC-21.  Both are shortrun kits but quite well done apparently.

I didn't even know Ozmods had complete kits... :banghead:
Thanks, Rickshaw! :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
The PC-21 is by 3D Blitz models and it looks very good: http://www.modellversium.de/kit/artikel.php?id=9638

That's the one.

OzMods kits in 1/72

Thanks for the link, may have to order one in the near future. :thumbsup:
"Sticks and stones may break some bones but a 3.57's gonna blow your damn head off!!"

NARSES2

Quote from: Mossie on January 02, 2021, 06:42:13 AM
1/72 Tachikawa Ki-54 Hei, new tool.
https://www.hannants.co.uk/product/SH72270


Looking forward to this. Apparently whilst it uses the old kit's product number it is a new tooling. Could cause some confusion on the second hand market ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

NARSES2

Apparently they are doing a range of 1/72 two stage Mosquitoes ? In competition with Airfix or in collaboration with ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

kitbasher

Quote from: NARSES2 on February 04, 2021, 06:11:39 AM
Apparently they are doing a range of 1/72 two stage Mosquitoes ? In competition with Airfix or in collaboration with ?

They're a mix of fighters and bombers, Chris.  See https://www.whatifmodellers.com/index.php?topic=30812.msg776992#msg776992 and https://www.specialhobby.info/2017/04/172-double-stage-engine-mosquito-kits.html.
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

The Wooksta!

I suspect they'll quietly be forgotten. Even if they do come out, post brexit prices for Czech kits will make them uneconomic against the Suffix one. I think the Airfix kit will have enough optional bits to do most of the two stage bomber nose types.

AZ are still going ahead with their NF36 kit though.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

Freightdog862

If you look at the timescale with some of the latest SH kits (like the Mirage F-1, III etc) its about 4 years from CAD to actually seeing the kit. I think SH will still do the Mosquito family, they are big enough not to be put off by an Airfix kit.

AZ have cancelled their two stage Mossie, but are working on an earlier version.

Colin

NARSES2

I see The Big H has Special Hobby's 1/32 Westland Whirlwind up for pre-order. Must admit I'm very, very tempted with this as it's one of my favourite WWII aircraft plus it won't be to big in 1/32 ? Probably be one I'd leave and buy at a show though ? We shall see  :angel:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

The Wooksta!

In 32nd, I don't think a Whirlwind would be much bigger than a 72nd Lancaster.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

Knightflyer

Quote from: The Wooksta! on March 21, 2021, 09:34:44 AM
In 32nd, I don't think a Whirlwind would be much bigger than a 72nd Lancaster.

Sad person that I am I couldn't resist doing the maths!

Whirlwind Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m) Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m) therefore length 307 mm and 429 mm wingspan (just over 12 inches and just under 17 inches!) in 1/32nd

Lancaster Length: 69 ft 4 in (21.13 m) Wingspan: 102 ft 0 in (31.09 m) therefore 293 mm and 431 mm wingspan in 1/72nd. Very close indeed!  ;D
Oh to be whiffing again :-(

zenrat

Quote from: Knightflyer on March 21, 2021, 10:23:00 AM
Quote from: The Wooksta! on March 21, 2021, 09:34:44 AM
In 32nd, I don't think a Whirlwind would be much bigger than a 72nd Lancaster.

Sad person that I am I couldn't resist doing the maths!

Whirlwind Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m) Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m) therefore length 307 mm and 429 mm wingspan (just over 12 inches and just under 17 inches!) in 1/32nd

Lancaster Length: 69 ft 4 in (21.13 m) Wingspan: 102 ft 0 in (31.09 m) therefore 293 mm and 431 mm wingspan in 1/72nd. Very close indeed!  ;D

Although some here might feel the need to lengthen the wings...
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

PR19_Kit

Quote from: zenrat on March 22, 2021, 04:06:08 AM
Quote from: Knightflyer on March 21, 2021, 10:23:00 AM
Quote from: The Wooksta! on March 21, 2021, 09:34:44 AM
In 32nd, I don't think a Whirlwind would be much bigger than a 72nd Lancaster.

Sad person that I am I couldn't resist doing the maths!

Whirlwind Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m) Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m) therefore length 307 mm and 429 mm wingspan (just over 12 inches and just under 17 inches!) in 1/32nd

Lancaster Length: 69 ft 4 in (21.13 m) Wingspan: 102 ft 0 in (31.09 m) therefore 293 mm and 431 mm wingspan in 1/72nd. Very close indeed!  ;D

Although some here might feel the need to lengthen the wings...


What? Really?  :-\
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Knightflyer

Quote from: PR19_Kit on March 22, 2021, 04:10:54 AM
Quote from: zenrat on March 22, 2021, 04:06:08 AM
Quote from: Knightflyer on March 21, 2021, 10:23:00 AM
Quote from: The Wooksta! on March 21, 2021, 09:34:44 AM
In 32nd, I don't think a Whirlwind would be much bigger than a 72nd Lancaster.

Sad person that I am I couldn't resist doing the maths!

Whirlwind Length: 32 ft 3 in (9.83 m) Wingspan: 45 ft 0 in (13.72 m) therefore length 307 mm and 429 mm wingspan (just over 12 inches and just under 17 inches!) in 1/32nd

Lancaster Length: 69 ft 4 in (21.13 m) Wingspan: 102 ft 0 in (31.09 m) therefore 293 mm and 431 mm wingspan in 1/72nd. Very close indeed!  ;D

Although some here might feel the need to lengthen the wings...


What? Really?  :-\

And then call the result "Welkin" .... I'm sure someone on here did an improved high altitude LONGER WINGED Whirlwind ???
Oh to be whiffing again :-(