avatar_Weaver

Special Hobby

Started by Weaver, August 28, 2009, 01:09:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rickshaw

We all do, I suspect, Kit.  I am looking forward to both versions of the Meteor.  Another question which springs to mind.  Is there now any major version of the Meteor which isn't now available as an injection moulded kit, except the PR.19?  ;D
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Thorvic

If we have the Trent and the prone then surely we should have the Metrovic meteor with the underslung Beryl engines, as that should really open up some interesting options for us lot  ;)
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on November 17, 2012, 08:19:30 PMAnother question which springs to mind.  Is there now any major version of the Meteor which isn't now available as an injection moulded kit, except the PR.19?  ;D

Hehe, and at the rate the Czechs are going I'm expecting a request for the PR19 plans from Prague any day.  ;) ;D
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

Quote from: Thorvic on November 18, 2012, 12:30:11 AM
If we have the Trent and the prone then surely we should have the Metrovic meteor with the underslung Beryl engines, as that should really open up some interesting options for us lot  ;)

Very much so, would be another jet I'd actually build
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

The Beryl Meteor didn't have the engines THAT much underslung.

There's a side-on photo of it on page 71 of the new Meteor book by Aeroplane Magazine and the engine centre-line looks about level with the underside of the wing. I'm going to mention the book in the 'My Library just increased' thread but it's REALLY good, apart from not mentioning the PR19 of course.  ;)
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Thorvic

Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

PR19_Kit

Yes I am, the piccie in the book is NOTHING like that one. It's Mk IV for a start, so it looks like they built two of them.





Scource is the book I mentioned above of course.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

#67
Now that's interesting. I've not heard of the latter version. Just read up on it in my Putnam's, although there's not much on it.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Knightflyer

I must I wasn't aware of the second 'long nacelles' version. I was aware of the 'low slung' one which had me wondering following Kit's comments if I'd remembered it really badly! I presume the Mk.4 Beryl-Meteor was as the standard Mk.4 except for the forward nacelle engine extensions (can't see the rear properly, are they standard length?) Is it the 'same' Beryl engine in both versions ? Just had a thought of a whiffed Meteor with the 'wrong' sort of Trent engines!  :o
Oh to be whiffing again :-(

jcf

The F.9/40M DG204/G didn't have F.2/4 Beryl engines, it had the earlier, and different, Metrovick F.2/1.
In a nutshell: all Beryls are F.2s but not all F.2s are Beryls.  ;D

The Beryl powered Meteor was the F.4 RA490, which later in life was equipped with jet deflector Nenes.
Shacklady's The Gloster Meteor has a nice profile photo of RA490 when equipped with Beryls.

BTW Shacklady's 'old' book, Macdonald 1962, is an excellent reference on the Meatbox and is readily available
very inexpensively. used.addall.com shows copies of the 1963 US Doubleday edition starting at $6.00 US.

PR19_Kit

There's another piccie of RA490 on the same page of the books showing the Nene installation and what HUGE nacelles they are!

The engines are mounted 8 ft forward of the wings (!) so the exhaust could exit on the aircraft's centre line, and there's a scrap view of the exhaust of one engine. Looks just like the back end of an F-35............

It seems the thing could fly at only 75 kts with the deflected thrust, that must have been worth watching!
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

kitbasher

Anyone treated themselves to a Special Hobby Seafire FR.47 yet, and if so, what are they like?  Seen nothing in terms of reviews (or even scuttlebutt) in magazines or on the web.
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

The Wooksta!

Erm, I answered your similar question in the stash thread...

Quote from: The Wooksta! on March 16, 2013, 11:04:34 AM
Quote from: kitbasher on March 16, 2013, 04:44:12 AM
Quote from: Thorvic on March 16, 2013, 01:39:49 AM
Delivered this week:-

Special Hobby 1/72 Mk47 Seafire

First impressions of the Seafire?  Seen nothing about it on t'interweb other than catalgue listings.

It's much the same kit as the SH Seafire 46, just with the addition of the undernose deeper scoop.  Ooodles of spares.

It's nice, although from the few test fits I've done, I'd fit the lower wing to the assembled fuselage before adding the upper wings.  If you assemble the wing first, it doesn't want to fit properly.  The Xtrakit 22 was like that, as well as the much vaunted Hasegawa VII/VIII/IX which some imbeciles think is better than the Airfix IX.  They're wrong.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

kitbasher

A fair cop, Lee.  Forgotten all about that.  Too much going on at work and home and precious little brain space left to retain that info!
What If? & Secret Project SIG member.
On the go: Beaumaris/Battle/Bronco/Barracuda/F-105(UK)/Flatning/Hellcat IV/Hunter PR11/Hurricane IIb/Ice Cream Tank/JP T4/Jumo MiG-15/M21/P1103 (early)/P1127/P1154-ish/Phantom FG1/I-153/Sea Hawk T7/Spitfire XII/Spitfire Tr18/Twin Otter/FrankenCOIN/Frankenfighter

Weaver

#74
Another obscure one with serious whiff potential: the Vought V-156 Chesapeake Mk.1:

http://www.hannants.co.uk/product/SH72268




Junkers W-34 "captured hack":

http://www.hannants.co.uk/product/SH72271

"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones