avatar_GTX

HP Halifax

Started by GTX, December 20, 2009, 12:30:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GTX

What no dedicated thread??? :blink:  Well there is now :thumbsup:.

To kick things off, how about the HP Hull derivative:



Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

jcf

Interesting, however, you may want to raise the wing.
Otherwise you'd have a horrible water ingestion problem.  ;D

Some real Halibag stuff in the old Handley-Page Centenary thread:
http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,20352.msg288130.html#msg288130

Jon

GTX

Quote from: joncarrfarrelly on December 20, 2009, 01:07:25 PM
Interesting, however, you may want to raise the wing.
Otherwise you'd have a horrible water ingestion problem.  ;D


Maybe that's why it never "took off" ;D

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Radish

There's always the Biggles one......
Once you've visited the land of the Loonies, a return is never far away.....

Still His (or Her) Majesty, Queen Caroline of the Midlands, Resident Drag Queen

MAD

Hey very nice work Greg!!!

Funny enough at present I am looking at info on the Short Sunderland!
You know Greg you may not be to far of the mark - as the info I am reading says - that short used the Sunderland flying boat as its basis for designing the Short Stirling heavy bomber!
It says that Short they literally took the boat hull off and used the top fuselage for the Stirling + the Sunderlands wings!!

I have to agree with Joncarrfarrelly though about the water ingestion problem - especially with the low slung arrangement of the radiators!

Keep up the inspiring and creative work mate!!

M.A.D 

DarrenP

Couple of ideas

Halifax Dambuster
Halifax Grand slam

rickshaw

Quote from: DarrenP on December 30, 2009, 01:38:46 AM
Couple of ideas

Halifax Dambuster
Halifax Grand slam

Don't think they could either lift or fit either in a Halifax.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

DarrenP

What if it could!!! with more powerful Bristol hercules or RR Merlin!!!

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on December 30, 2009, 01:57:25 AM
Don't think they could either lift or fit either in a Halifax.

Remember this IS Whiff-World.......
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

pyro-manic

Fuselage stretch, longer wings, bigger engines (Shackleton-style cowlings?). Tiger Force markings and Tallboys.
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

Barry Krell

Quote from: DarrenP on December 30, 2009, 01:44:56 PM
What if it could!!! with more powerful Bristol hercules or RR Merlin!!!

Except that it isn't the power of the engines. It's the design of the wing, the spar positioning, carry through and the load bearing members of the fuselage.  Avro designed the bay of the original Manchester to carry two torpedoes, hence the long uninterupted bay which could accommodate larger and larger bombs.  The Halifax, like the Stirling, was designed to carry a specific load of the largest bomb available at the time (1937?), which I think were 1,000 pounders.  Both aircraft were too inflexible load wise and due to the design couldn't be altered easily.
Aston Martin  - Power, Beauty, Soul.

buzzbomb

I like the lines of the Halifax Bay (as you could name the Flying boat version). :wub:
There is the possibility of putting the engines on top of the wing rather than underslung. That would perhaps would fix the engine issue, radiators on top, but really I like as it is as well.

Now this is fodder for the Navalise it GB.. if only one had time :huh:

GTX

Quote from: buzzbomb on December 30, 2009, 08:48:10 PM
I like the lines of the Halifax Bay (as you could name the Flying boat version). :wub:

Sorry - already named it the HP Hull.

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

ysi_maniac

#13
Passengers Halifaxx. Better than Halton, I hope. ;D

Will die without understanding this world.

NARSES2

Certainly looks better  :thumbsup:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.