avatar_GTX

Fairey Battle Whiffs

Started by GTX, December 30, 2009, 12:57:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Wooksta!

Fulmar was by Vista.  Revell and Smer boxed it before Airfix.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

Thorvic

Quote from: NARSES2 on June 26, 2014, 07:37:45 AM
Like your thinking Old Wombat.

As per the Fulmar idea, it's a good one. Thorvic PM'd me with it as well as seeing it here. I've got an Airfix boxing of somebodies Fulmar as well.

However any attempt to build one is a while off, still it's gone into the "ideas book"

Iactually suggested the Firefly F1 as a possible Fairet based Sturmovik, relocate the aft cockpit directlt aft of the fwd cockpit, cut down the spine and add suitable rear guns be it pintiple mounted or possibly turret, remove hook and wingfold seams -  :thumbsup:
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

NARSES2

Quote from: Thorvic on June 26, 2014, 12:21:38 PM
Quote from: NARSES2 on June 26, 2014, 07:37:45 AM
Like your thinking Old Wombat.

As per the Fulmar idea, it's a good one. Thorvic PM'd me with it as well as seeing it here. I've got an Airfix boxing of somebodies Fulmar as well.

However any attempt to build one is a while off, still it's gone into the "ideas book"

Iactually suggested the Firefly F1 as a possible Fairet based Sturmovik, relocate the aft cockpit directlt aft of the fwd cockpit, cut down the spine and add suitable rear guns be it pintiple mounted or possibly turret, remove hook and wingfold seams -  :thumbsup:

Doh ! Yup Firefly not Fulmar  :banghead:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Mossie

A question on the Battle:    Bombers at the time where usually named after towns, the Battle received the more fighter like naming convention.  Why was the Battle so named?
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

JayBee

I would guess that it was named after the town of Battle, near to Hastings and is the true site of a certain little rumpus in 1066.
Alle kunst ist umsunst wenn ein engel auf das zundloch brunzt!!

Sic biscuitus disintegratum!

Cats are not real. 
They are just physical manifestations of collisions between enigma & conundrum particles.

Any aircraft can be improved by giving it a SHARKMOUTH!

jcf

Perhaps it was outside the naming convention because it was intended to replace two-seat day bomber aircraft like the Hawker Hart and Hind,
rather than a 'true-bomber' e.g. twin-engine?

The Putnam doesn't make reference to the why of the naming, and I've not yet found a refernce in the Flight Archive.

zenrat

Quote from: JayBee on August 17, 2015, 09:05:11 AM
I would guess that it was named after the town of Battle, near to Hastings and is the true site of a certain little rumpus in 1066.

To be followed by the Fairey Bognor and possibly more appropriately the Fairy (sic) Brighton...
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

Mossie

Thanks guys.  I'd thought similar to John, there's a handful of similar breaks with the convention.  Jim, I didn't know there was a place called Battle so I guess it fits with convention after all.

:cheers:
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

kitnut617

Quote from: zenrat on August 18, 2015, 02:33:28 AM
Quote from: JayBee on August 17, 2015, 09:05:11 AM
I would guess that it was named after the town of Battle, near to Hastings and is the true site of a certain little rumpus in 1066.

To be followed by the Fairey Bognor and possibly more appropriately the Fairy (sic) Brighton...

In Butlin's colours I'll bet ---    :lol:
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

NARSES2

Quote from: zenrat on August 18, 2015, 02:33:28 AM
Quote from: JayBee on August 17, 2015, 09:05:11 AM
I would guess that it was named after the town of Battle, near to Hastings and is the true site of a certain little rumpus in 1066.

To be followed by the Fairey Bognor and possibly more appropriately the Fairy (sic) Brighton...

Naughty boy  ;D ;D In a Kenneth Williams voice

Yup Battle is the true site of the battle. Battle Abbey was built to commemorate the event. Was taken there on a few school trips.

As for British naming conventions ? You just start to think you understand it and then something comes up which makes you think ?????? I gave up years ago. As an aside when ever I try to think of a name for one of my wifs it sounds silly or childish, or both. When others do the same it sounds perfect. What's that ? Lack of confidence in my own naming attempts or something deeper ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

zenrat

What's wrong with silly?  ;D

Naming conventions?  What naming conventions?  I think the fact that Fairey produced 4 related aircraft named after a town (we think), a bird, a fish and an insect shows that that there really wasn't one.

Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

NARSES2

Quote from: zenrat on August 18, 2015, 06:21:15 PM
Naming conventions?  What naming conventions?  I think the fact that Fairey produced 4 related aircraft named after a town (we think), a bird, a fish and an insect shows that that there really wasn't one.



Must admit I don't think there was an official one but some companies had a convention which they tended to use, most of the time
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: NARSES2 on August 19, 2015, 07:17:48 AM
Quote from: zenrat on August 18, 2015, 06:21:15 PM
Naming conventions?  What naming conventions?  I think the fact that Fairey produced 4 related aircraft named after a town (we think), a bird, a fish and an insect shows that that there really wasn't one.



Must admit I don't think there was an official one but some companies had a convention which they tended to use, most of the time

Wasn't the RAF's convention that bombers were named after towns/villages etc? At least once they'd started with the Heyford they seemed to head that way. Heyford itself is TINY (I went to school there....) so it doesn't count as a town at all!
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

DarrenP2

could you put a couple of 20mm hispano's in the wings and Rocket projectiles under the wing with a more powerful merlin better propellor and with faired nose.

zenrat

A Merlin related question.

If I was to build a Battle powered by a two speed two stage Merlin (a Merlin 61 say) would the only modification needed be an intake under the prop?
Could it need more cooling?
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..