avatar_Fulcrum

Dual-use Missiles

Started by Fulcrum, December 15, 2010, 11:29:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Fulcrum

Of course with technology, it's hard to use the missiles on something other than what it is designed for.
But, there are exceptions:-USAF F-102's in Vietnam firing their falcon missiles at Vietcong campfires
      -Egyptian SA-2 Guidelines being firing at Israeli tanks(& yet missing badly)
      -A USN A-4 shooting down a Mig-17 with unguided Zuni rockets

Here's the idea: why combining some uses together for more weapons & more weapons storage capability, albeit possible expensive avionics & systems.

Some suggestions: - a Medium-range, radar guided missile for both long-range air-to-air & SEAD engagements(precedent: some of the first Shrikes were re-manufactured Sparrows)
- a medium range, surface launched missile for both Surface-to-Air & Surface-to-Surface engagements(combining S-300/Patriot with ATACMS, eventually becoming more able to do fire/artillery missions/operations)(precedent: that SA-2 incident mentioned above)
- a infantry carried & launched RPG/MANPADS(precedent: Mogadishu 1993/Black Hawk Down)

Maybe others yet thought of...
Fulcrums Forever!!!
Master Assembler

dy031101

To the individual soldiers, *everything* is a frontal assault!

====================

Current Hobby Priority...... Sigh......

To-do list here

Fulcrum

Yes, that too.

(Any missile that is capable to be launched from multiple launch platforms at any(reasonable) target)
Fulcrums Forever!!!
Master Assembler

dy031101

Checking size differences between AIM-4, AIM-26, and ADATS missiles makes me think...... ADATS missiles for F-102 and F-106?  ;D
To the individual soldiers, *everything* is a frontal assault!

====================

Current Hobby Priority...... Sigh......

To-do list here

Fulcrum

Fulcrums Forever!!!
Master Assembler

Hobbes

For anti-air missiles you need a big engine (to give speed and maneuverability), and a small warload is enough to defeat an aircraft.

For anti-surface missiles, it's the opposite. Less speed is sufficient and you need a large warhead to defeat armored or dispersed targets.

The only component that can easily be adapted for dual use is the guidance system. Given modern technology, that is - I don't think 1960's missiles have the room for a dual-use seeker.

This means that you can, in a pinch, repurpose an anti-air missile for limited ground attack. The other way round is much harder.

Maverick

Realistically, I think the only way you'd be able to have a dual-role weapon would be dual role but in the same engagement scenario.  Something like an ARM & PGM might be possible, but I couldn't see an AA dual roled weapon (BVR vs WVR are very differing requirements).

Regards,

Mav

Weaver

There are examples of AAMs being used as SAMs, but they suffer a significant range penalty unless the design is changed:

BPDMS Sea Sparrow (SAM range = 8 miles, AAM range = 20 miles. Later Sea Sparrow versions change the missile designby ever-greater degrees)

Chaperral/Sea Chaperral (Sidewinder)

AMRAAM (forget what the SAM version's called, but it IS in service)


Likewise, most MANPADS can be adapted to aircraft/helo launch: Stinger, Mistral, SA-7 and Starstreak AAMs have all been deployed, or at least developed.


Most ATGWs can be used against helicopters with a reasonable chance of success.

Most naval SAMs can be used as anti-surface weapons out to horizon-range, since if they can lock on to a small aircraft, they can damn well lock onto a ship! Their warheads arn't ideal for the task, but it's generally felt that their speed does much to compensate for this, particularly in view of the fact that most modern ships are unarmoured. This isn't hypothetical either: Standard has been tested in the role and has been described as doing as much damage as a 14" shell! I have an excellent account of a NATO exercise in the late 1980's in which a Sea-Harrier-damaged "Moskva" (actually played by a Spruance) was brought back into action by it's crew and performed a "death-or-glory" suicide run against HMS Invinvible, the two ship ending up trading Sea Darts and SA-N-3s at about 15 miles! :blink: (Invincible won, but it wasn't pretty.....)






Something that occurred to to me years ago was the dual use of very fast kinetic kill weapons like Starstreak or HVM. Whether intended for use against aircraft or tanks, these all feature hypersonic flight speed and solid warheads, so it would seem possible to merge the two functions. What I imagined was a big central KE penetrator to penetrate a tank, with a ring of smaller flechettes packed around it with a burster charge that deploys them just short of the target. Against a tank, they're essentially wasted, but against an aircraft, they give the "scatter gun" effect neccessary to guarantee a hit.

"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

deathjester

IIRC, the AIM-54 Phoenix has a home-on-jam capability.  It would probably be quite simple to make it into a long ranged ARM...?

Also, don't most IR Guided missiles have a boresight launch mode, which just fires it straight ahead if it can't get a lock?

GTX

QuoteAMRAAM (forget what the SAM version's called, but it IS in service)

There are actually a few:

SL-AMRAAM (Surface Launched (SL) and AMRAAM)...also sometimes goes by name of CLAWS (HUMRAAM):



NASAMS (Norwegian Advanced Surface to Air Missile System):



HAWK-AMRAAM:



Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

GTX

#10
There are actually a couple of real world programs underway which do this sort of thing:

DARPA's triple target terminator (T3) program is supposed to develop a missile that can perform the anti-aircraft (i.e. AMRAAM style), anti-radiation (i.e. HARM style) and anti-cruise-missile missions.

There is also the Joint Dual Role Air Dominance Missile (JDRADM) program by the USAF to have missile simply do the anti-aircraft (AMRAAM), anti-radiation (HARM) missions.

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Gondor

I think the Israeli Derby missile can be used from the surface as well as from the air

Gondor
My Ability to Imagine is only exceeded by my Imagined Abilities

Gondor's Modelling Rule Number Three: Everything will fit perfectly untill you apply glue...

I know it's in a book I have around here somewhere....

Weaver

Cheers Greg.

IIRC, there are also plans, but no hardware yet, to use MICAs in the SAM role.
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

GTX

Yep - Vertical Launch Mica Short Range Air Defence System, Europe is essentially a surface launched Mica:



There is also a surface launched IRIS-T (funnily enough called IRIS-T SL):



As mentioned by Gondor there is also the Israeil Rafael SpyDer (Surface-to-air Python and Derby) System which uses ground launched versions of the Python 5 and Derby missiles:



Finally, there is the MBDA CAMM (Common Anti-air Modular Missile) systems which is planned to use elements of the ASRAAM system on Land, Ship and Aerial (i.e. as an updated ASRAAM)  applications:




Mind you I would not really class any of these as Dual-Role missiles, but rather SAM derivatives of Air-to-Air missiles.

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Jschmus

In Vietnam, cruisers equipped with Talos SAMs fired their missiles against North Vietnamese SAM radar sites.  These missiles were fitted with an anti-radar homing system.  In the Falklands, HMS Glamorgan fired her Sea Slug missiles against an Argentine radar site and a runway, but it's unknown whether the weapon was effective or not.
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."-Alan Moore