avatar_Radish

Airfix

Started by Radish, September 01, 2007, 09:46:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

The Wooksta!

You'd be better off using the older Ia, bearing in mind all the panel lines were filled in and sanded down.  Easier to sand off raised panels than fill them in!  Also cheaper, as I assume you've a reasonable stock?

92?  I think my stash of Spits is into 3 figures...  I honestly don't know as I've never actually counted them.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

kitnut617

And I thought my stash of 46 Spits was overboard   :lol: :lol:
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

The Wooksta!

That's a girl's stash!
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

NARSES2

Will you lot stopped teasing me with all this Airfix Spit I stuff, it's driving me mad  :banghead: :banghead:

Hopefully I shall pick up a couple today...all hail the Thorvic  :bow:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Weaver

Here's an admission: I have NEVER built an Airfix Spitfire, even when I was a kid, or indeed, any other Spitfire either. I have exactly ONE in the stash (a Heller bubble-top, clipped-wing one (I don't know the Mk.Nos off by heart either). There's something about both the Spit and the 109 that just doesn't appeal to me (I only have two 109s, and both of those came in job lots with other things that I really wanted).
"Things need not have happened to be true. Tales and dreams are the shadow-truths that will endure when mere facts are dust and ashes, and forgot."
 - Sandman: A Midsummer Night's Dream, by Neil Gaiman

"I dunno, I'm making this up as I go."
 - Indiana Jones

NARSES2

#650
Quote from: NARSES2 on September 06, 2010, 01:35:37 AM
Will you lot stopped teasing me with all this Airfix Spit I stuff, it's driving me mad  :banghead: :banghead:

Hopefully I shall pick up a couple today...all hail the Thorvic  :bow:

Picked them up from the PO today. Worth the wait  :wub: :wub: :thumbsup:

Quote from: Weaver on September 06, 2010, 02:44:06 AM
Here's an admission: I have NEVER built an Airfix Spitfire, even when I was a kid, or indeed, any other Spitfire either. I have exactly ONE in the stash (a Heller bubble-top, clipped-wing one (I don't know the Mk.Nos off by heart either). There's something about both the Spit and the 109 that just doesn't appeal to me (I only have two 109s, and both of those came in job lots with other things that I really wanted).

It would be a sad old world if we all liked the same things mate. I for one can't "stand" F.15/16/18's, and far worse things happen at sea. I even know a couple of Man Utd supporters  :wacko: ;D 
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

lancer

QuoteI even know a couple of Man Utd supporters     

Are you really sure that's something youi want to admit to??? :o :o

Gorgeous looking Valliant shots, Gotta have a few of them when they come out. I suppose I should be gettign some more spit kits for the stash, I think I have precisely 1 at the moment. I guess I'd better do the same with the 109 & 110 kits as well.
If you love, love without reservation; If you fight, fight without fear - THAT is the way of the warrior

If you go into battle knowing you will die, then you will live. If you go into battle hoping to live, then you will die

NARSES2

Just checked the spreadsheet and I have 65 Spits of all marks in 1/72. Plus various Seafires, Spitefull's and Seafangs in 1/72 and a few Spits in 1/48
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

pyro-manic

I have none in the stash, and have only ever built two - both Airfix Vbs, one as a child, one a year or so back. I'm hoping Airfix will do a F.22/24 in 1:72. I much prefer the big-tailed bubble-tops to the earlier versions.
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Weaver on September 06, 2010, 02:44:06 AM
I have exactly ONE in the stash (a Heller bubble-top, clipped-wing one (I don't know the Mk.Nos off by heart either)

That'll be a 16 then, or an XVI to be more accurate.  -_-

Sadly I DO know the Mk. Nos. off by heart, but when you've lived in a house where the boss-man spoke of nothing BUT Spitfires for years and years (when he wasn't on about Audaxes that is....) it all tends to rub off on you.  :lol:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

The Wooksta!

The next 72nd Spitfire they'll release will be a IIa/Va, judging by the way the new Ia is broken down.  And I'd definitely welcome a 22/24 Spit.
"It's basically a cure -  for not being an axe-wielding homicidal maniac. The potential market's enormous!"

"Visit Scarfolk today!"
https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/

"Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio!"

The Plan:
www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic

NARSES2

Quote from: pyro-manic on September 07, 2010, 10:55:17 AM
I'm hoping Airfix will do a F.22/24 in 1:72. I much prefer the big-tailed bubble-tops to the earlier versions.

Also like to see a F.22/24 in 1/72.  :thumbsup: Must admit I prefer the earlier marks myself. Don't get me wrong I like all Spitfires/Seafires but the Mk I's, II's & Vs have a certain "daintiness" about them. I'll go dig a hole because of my use of that rather effete word and Spitfire in the same sentence  ;D
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: NARSES2 on September 08, 2010, 01:00:08 AM
Don't get me wrong I like all Spitfires/Seafires but the Mk I's, II's & Vs have a certain "daintiness" about them. I'll go dig a hole because of my use of that rather effete word and Spitfire in the same sentence  ;D

Chris,

Why dig? It suits the early Marks very well.

Compared to a Hurricane, a veritable brute by comparison, a Spitfire I is dainty. As time went on you can see the 'daintiness' being bred out, and when they changed to the Griffon engine with the Mk XII it was almost gone completely! The later Marks, the 20 series models, are almost totally different aircraft.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

Quote from: PR19_Kit on September 08, 2010, 01:17:20 AM
Quote from: NARSES2 on September 08, 2010, 01:00:08 AM
Don't get me wrong I like all Spitfires/Seafires but the Mk I's, II's & Vs have a certain "daintiness" about them. I'll go dig a hole because of my use of that rather effete word and Spitfire in the same sentence  ;D

Chris,

Why dig? It suits the early Marks very well.

Compared to a Hurricane, a veritable brute by comparison, a Spitfire I is dainty. As time went on you can see the 'daintiness' being bred out, and when they changed to the Griffon engine with the Mk XII it was almost gone completely! The later Marks, the 20 series models, are almost totally different aircraft.


I have heard it said (possibly by you sir ?) that under normall circumstances the latter marks would have had a different name, but Vickers in their canniness used the same name so that the MOD didn't go through the full procurement route and just signed on the dotted line for a upgraded airframe. Interesting ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: NARSES2 on September 08, 2010, 01:27:02 AM
I have heard it said (possibly by you sir ?) that under normall circumstances the latter marks would have had a different name, but Vickers in their canniness used the same name so that the MOD didn't go through the full procurement route and just signed on the dotted line for a upgraded airframe. Interesting ?

Sir? You must be thinking of some other fellow!  ;D

But seriously I think we did discuss that at a recent show somewhere. Hawker followed the more normal route and developed the Hurricane in exactly the same way, but they DID change the names as they went on. viz the Tornado, Typhoon, Tempest etc. (Hm, that sequence sounds vaguely familiar somehow....)
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit