avatar_Radish

Airfix

Started by Radish, September 01, 2007, 09:46:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

NARSES2

Last time I saw the 262 at Hendon there was a 3" gap between the wing root and the fuselage. Wonder if Airfix's Lidar scanning will replicate that ?  :angel: ;)
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Martin H

Quote from: NARSES2 on July 30, 2017, 07:17:19 AM
Last time I saw the 262 at Hendon there was a 3" gap between the wing root and the fuselage. Wonder if Airfix's Lidar scanning will replicate that ?  :angel: ;)

At least it would be a fairly accurate kit of the real thing then  :angel: :angel: ;D ;D
I always hope for the best.
Unfortunately,
experience has taught me to expect the worst.

Size (of the stash) matters.

IPMS (UK) What if? SIG Leader.
IPMS (UK) Project Cancelled SIG Member.

rickshaw

Quote from: NARSES2 on July 30, 2017, 07:17:19 AM
Last time I saw the 262 at Hendon there was a 3" gap between the wing root and the fuselage. Wonder if Airfix's Lidar scanning will replicate that ?  :angel: ;)

Sounds like the 109 which is hanging in the ANZAC Gallery at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra (well worth seeing BTW).  It has a 1-2 inch gap around it's engine panel on top of the nose.  It's a late model Gustav so I've always assumed it was simply how it fitted by that stage of the war with all the production problems they were having.

Perhaps they need to invest in some PSR?   :thumbsup:
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

I've seen a few "historic" aircraft where the "fit" has not been perfect. Always wondered if it was really like that or a case of mix and match with bits from various aircraft.

The weld seams on some AFV's are a sight to behold as well. A nephew in law is a Class 1 welder and couldn't believe some of the examples we saw at Bovington  ;)

By the way coincidentally August's MAI has a photo report on the 262's return to Cosford.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Old Wombat

Its along the same lines as the story I heard about a WW2 aircraft (I'm pretty sure it was American) being restored where they found an entire row of rivets that had completely missed the framework they were meant to attach to.

Rosie the Riveter & friends weren't always as competent as some may have had the pilots believe. :rolleyes:
Has a life outside of What-If & wishes it would stop interfering!

"The purpose of all War is Peace" - St. Augustine

veritas ad mortus veritas est

NARSES2

Quote from: Old Wombat on July 31, 2017, 06:51:28 AM
Its along the same lines as the story I heard about a WW2 aircraft (I'm pretty sure it was American) being restored where they found an entire row of rivets that had completely missed the framework they were meant to attach to.



I can easily believe that. If you look at the pressures people were under added to the fact that most of them had been trained up very, very quickly, I'm just surprised there were more problems caused by "shoddy" workmanship. Or, as is more likely, was it simply a case that the accidents weren't reported in order not to endanger morale ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

KiwiZac

I'd think the latter, Chris. But it makes perfect sense that a few issues popped up.

Quote from: NARSES2 on July 31, 2017, 06:06:23 AM
I've seen a few "historic" aircraft where the "fit" has not been perfect. Always wondered if it was really like that or a case of mix and match with bits from various aircraft.
I've been watching a lot of old Flying Legends home movies on YouTube lately, sometimes the folks seem to need a lot of pressure to close the engine cowls! Particularly on the 109s. At least modellers can shave and sand to fit!
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG"
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

Snowtrooper

From what I've read, German industry at the time had in general still problems in moving from cottage industry to assembly line with tolerances. For example, spare parts coming from a different factory than the actual tank/airplane/etc. did not necessarily fit without some tinkering. After the Allied air raids forced to disperse the production, the problem got even worse. So wings not fitting in a late-war 109 would not surprise at all, since they probably came from a different "factory" than the fuselage and were only put together during the final assembly.

Thorvic

Their new 1/48 P-51D Mustang is previewed on their Workbench section of the Airfix Website today. Not my scale or theme but I guess some will be interested.
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

McColm

There's the new Curtis Tomahawk in 1/48 scale.

McColm

I've just seen the Airfix pictures of the Avro Shackleton AEW.2 due to be released on August 29th. Priced at £44.99 although some shops are taking pre-orders at discount prices.

NARSES2

The new tool 1/72 Me 262 is now available.

Might pick one up at Frimley, see what it's like.
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

KiwiZac

I think I may need to get the new Mustang, it looks rather nice!

Quote from: McColm on August 08, 2017, 12:10:46 PM
There's the new Curtis Tomahawk in 1/48 scale.
Same plastic as the gorgeous P-40B released a couple of years back. Buy it, people - I've never smiled so much during a build in all my life. A true joy to assemble.
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG"
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

NARSES2

Quote from: KiwiZac on September 06, 2017, 01:29:40 PM
I think I may need to get the new Mustang, it looks rather nice!



Which scale Zac ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

McColm

The new B-17 MkIII has been released. 1/72 scale.