avatar_jcf

T-28 Trojan, AT-28 Nomad

Started by jcf, March 19, 2008, 11:04:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

jcf

The T-28 series have an equipment bay/cargo compartment at the trailing edge of the wing, below and behind the rear seat. I've looked in an opened up T-28 and its a pretty big space, plenty of room for more fuel tanks. Hell, you could carry people in the compartment and evidently they did on numerous occasions.
The open hatch is visible in this photo:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/North-American-T-28A/1139652/L/

The most powerful version was the YAT-28E with T55 turbo-prop, compared to the T-28A the take-off gross weight had grown by a factor of 2. While the YAT-28E was not produced, the Chinese Nationalist Air Force built fifty their own turbine conversions using Lycoming T53 engines mounted on T-28A airframes.











As far as conversion to a single seater is concerned, the way you had it first is probably the better way from an engineering and piloting standpoint.  Placing the pilot aft would be rather anachronistic, and horribly reduce the pilots view.

BTW the first of the "family", the XSN2J-1, was a tail-dragger.

Jon

Jeffry Fontaine

#1
Thanks for the additional images Jon.  Took just a moment to crop the YAT-28E side view to come up with the next evolution.  I think the extra engine cowlings provided in the Modelcraft F-82 kit might be a good starting point for modifying the T-28 kit.  It would certainly provide the needed length for the engine. 
Unaffiliated Independent Subversive
----------------------------------
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

Archibald

QuoteDeveloped to replace the AT-28C and AT-28D ground attack models that were created for the COIN mission, what could have been done with this airframe in regards to modification into a single seat aircraft?

Hehehe... imagine the Algerian war lasted a bit longer, and France needed to replace its T-6 "Gordini" (with their engine "uprated" as was the Renault-8 at the time :lol:)

Then you can dream of a Turbomeca-powered T-28 (maybe with the Pucara engine, think it was the Astazou)
King Arthur: Can we come up and have a look?
French Soldier: Of course not. You're English types.
King Arthur: What are you then?
French Soldier: I'm French. Why do you think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king?

Well regardless I would rather take my chance out there on the ocean, that to stay here and die on this poo-hole island spending the rest of my life talking to a gosh darn VOLLEYBALL.

GTX

Also look here (http://www.whatifmodelers.com/index.php/topic,18608.30.html) for some of the Mustang inspired trainers that led to the T-28.

Regards,

Greg
All hail the God of Frustration!!!

Jeffry Fontaine

Quote from: Jeffry Fontaine on June 08, 2008, 08:45:20 AMHas anyone performed a check-fit on the T-28 with a four blade propeller and spinner from a P-51 Mustang?  A simple cosmetic upgrade might really make a difference in appearance. 




Not too long ago I contacted another member of the WHIF forum to purchase a resin conversion kit for the Boeing XB-38 (Allison V1710 engine cowlings) which is a bit primitive when compared to the current crop of resin conversions out there.  Having no real desire to build the XB-38 which is really sleek looking I had other plans for the parts such as using them as the starting point for a turbine power egg for a couple of other projects.  This leaves me with several of the Allison engine cowlings that could be put to other uses such as a V1710 powered T-28.  So I figured I would share that idea with you all and let your imaginations wander. 
Unaffiliated Independent Subversive
----------------------------------
"Every day we hear about new studies 'revealing' what should have been obvious to sentient beings for generations; 'Research shows wolverines don't like to be teased" -- Jonah Goldberg

PanzerWulff

Jeff the single seat profiles sort of remind me of aTrike geared Grumman Bearcat Panzer Likes  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
"Panzer"
Chris"PanzerWulff"Gray "The Whiffing Fool"
NOTE TO SELF Stick to ARMOR!!!
Self proclaimed "GODZILLA Junkie"!

famvburg


     It has a Ryan Fireball look as well.


Quote from: PanzerWulff on December 13, 2008, 07:23:54 AM
Jeff the single seat profiles sort of remind me of aTrike geared Grumman Bearcat Panzer Likes  :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
"Panzer"

elmayerle

Archibald, given the various engine ratings, I'd expect a French tuurbine-powered AT-28 to be closer to the proposed AT-28F with two wing-mounted T76 (Garrett TPE331) engines replaced by Astazous like the Pucara uses.  At least, that'd be an easier one to model; for a single-engined conversion, you'd need to find a Turbomeca engine comparable in performance to the T53 or T55 (though I'm certain there's one out there - just don't have references to hand, here).

Jefry, is that conversion in 1/72 or 1/48?  I've got a couple Heller T-28 kits that'd benefit in 1/72.  As it stands right now, they'll be going to twin-engined route described above.
"Reality is the leading cause of stress amongst those in touch with it."
--Jane Wagner and Lily Tomlin

apophenia

The Turmo is about the right shp and timeframe. The Breguet 941 of 1961 had 1,250 shp Turmo IIIDs driving three-blade props. I note though that Breguet originally considered RR Gnomes so a T58 would be another option for French aircraft.

elmayerle

That would likely work, though you might want to consider one more size up as the T55 can go up to the 3000 - 5000 shp range.  Still, that would work for a whiffed T-28.  Mind you, I admit to s certain preference for the twin engines and solid nose (be it a gun nose, a recce nose, or whatever).
"Reality is the leading cause of stress amongst those in touch with it."
--Jane Wagner and Lily Tomlin

chrisonord

I have just started building a turbo prop conversion Trojan, it is staying as a 2 seater, as that sort of engineering is beyond me :blink:
But, whilst looking in the spares box to find a suitable donor part to make the new engine, I came across the exhaust end of a saab Draken, and stuck that onto the Trojan's engine cowl, with a bit of putty and sanding etc it should turn out looking pretty ok.....he says :rolleyes:
I am going to use a trimmed down Mosquito prop and spinner also as it fits nice and snug in the gap.
Cheers,
Chris.
The dogs philosophy on life.
If you cant eat it hump it or fight it,
Pee on it and walk away!!

apophenia

Quote from: elmayerle on September 26, 2009, 02:17:02 PM
That would likely work, though you might want to consider one more size up as the T55 can go up to the 3000 - 5000 shp range.  Still, that would work for a whiffed T-28.  Mind you, I admit to s certain preference for the twin engines and solid nose (be it a gun nose, a recce nose, or whatever).

Not sure if there are any French turboprop/shafts from that period with that kind of output. (I was aiming more at the T53 range). Artouste might work for a lighter twin.

chrisonord

If you are going to make a 2 engine version how about a pair of engines from a Shorts Skyvan.
The dogs philosophy on life.
If you cant eat it hump it or fight it,
Pee on it and walk away!!

elmayerle

Quote from: chrisonord on September 26, 2009, 02:56:16 PM
If you are going to make a 2 engine version how about a pair of engines from a Shorts Skyvan.


That's what the original AT-28F proposal was, two Garrett AiResearch T76 (TPE331) turboprops on the wings with a solid nose for whatever equipment fit (conceiveably, you could do a quick-change nose with alternate gun and recce versions).
"Reality is the leading cause of stress amongst those in touch with it."
--Jane Wagner and Lily Tomlin

chrisonord

Hmmm?
I have 2 solid gun noses for a B-25 in 72nd scale, one has the 75 mm gun in, are these any use to you if you should go that route elmayerle??
Chris.
The dogs philosophy on life.
If you cant eat it hump it or fight it,
Pee on it and walk away!!