C-54-X, DC-4-T

[The Rat]

After the introduction of the Douglas C-54 Skymaster to USAAF service in 1942 one possible problem was evident. In the planned island hopping campaign against Japan the use of forward airbases would be needed quickly, but the Skymaster's nosewheel arrangement, while no problem at most bases, was a distinct disadvantage for front-line personnel who would often be required to 'hand-bomb' material on and off. Without the luxury of fork-lifts and other equipment the use of the otherwise very capable aircraft could be limited, so research was conducted into producing a tailwheel version which would bring the rear cargo door closer to the ground. Small modifications to the airframe resulted in a sufficient rearward movement of the center of gravity, and one test aircraft was produced, but without the installation of a rear door.




Initial testing revealed no difference in handling in the air, and pilots trained on conventional gear aircraft had no problems with ground-looping on landing. Ground crews who were used to the C-47 indulged in the predictable grumbling about having another larger monster to load and unload, but the concept had been proven. It was a low priority however, and those higher in command were slow to implement production of the new design. Their reasoning became obvious on August 6, 1945, when even more impressive scientific developments halted any island hopping and led to Japan's surrender.




After the war the aircraft sat for several years until American Airlines bought it surplus and used it on some routes where passenger embarking equipment was non-existent, and although it was useful with the implementation of small steps the destinations themselves did not prove profitable, and the aircraft was resold. After serving in a cargo capacity for a few years it disappeared on a flight from Miami to Cuba, and as a result few people have ever heard of this variant.



The build: No, I don't want to talk about it. Those who have tried this Academy kit will understand. Those who haven't should just take this as a warning. I'm going to have a drink now.

A large one.

Maybe two.

[PR19_Kit]

Two?

After doing a cracking job like you should award yourself at least FOUR!

That looks really REALLY good, especially considering what a bag of bones the original kit is. Very well indeed Mr Rat, that's a great job. 

[upnorth]

I like it!

Very reminiscent of the early post war Handley Page and Avro tail dragging transports.

[RotorheadTX]

Great work!! I know what you mean about the source kit, so this one rates a '++Good' rating on the Silk Purse scale. 

[Stargazer]

Beautiful build and great backup story! 

[NARSES2]

Nice 

[Scooterman]

BEAUTIFUL WORK Rat-san!