Catapault launched Aircraft with Torpedoes or Rockets

Started by tigercat, April 20, 2012, 11:54:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tigercat

I have never heard of any catapault launched aircraft carrying out a torpedo attack so I'm assuming that  because of how they were launched carriage of a torpedo was impossible. Now what I'm thinking is say you had a catapault aircraft with an internal bombay which could fit a torpedo or you fitted the aircraft with RP3 racks under the wing how would that have affected things in WW2

For example at the Battle of the River Plate the allies had 3 aircraft

rickshaw

The problem is weight.  Most torpedos weight over a thousand+ pounds.  Either you need an aircraft with a larger wingspan or a much more powerful engine and then you need a considerably more powerful catapult than what was carried or fitted onto most warships, particularly cruisers.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Could the Swordfish floatplane be catapault launched ?
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

tigercat

Yes it was a Swordfish on Warpspite that helped her sink all those German Destroyers in Norway


PR19_Kit

Presumably we're talking about non-carrier catapults here? The ones fitted to cruisers and battleships etc.

Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Rheged

Quote from: rickshaw on April 20, 2012, 11:57:18 PM
The problem is weight.  Most torpedos weight over a thousand+ pounds.  Either you need an aircraft with a larger wingspan or a much more powerful engine and then you need a considerably more powerful catapult than what was carried or fitted onto most warships, particularly cruisers.

I remember reading somewhere that the Arado  caried by Graf Spee  dropped a couple of scare charges  on  one of the merchant ships  later sunk by the raider........is this likely to be accurate, or is it another case of memory decay  on my part?
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

NARSES2

Quote from: tigercat on April 21, 2012, 02:08:01 AM
Yes it was a Swordfish on Warpspite that helped her sink all those German Destroyers in Norway



Right my memory had hell up for once then  :thumbsup: Could she have carried a torpedo ? prsumably she could carry small bombs and smoke flaots etc
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

tigercat

Here we go so she could and did carry bombs.

Swordfish were used tentatively for escort duty at the very beginning, until they had a chance to prove themselves. This soon came to pass, when a floatplane version, flown by W.M.L. Brown  off the HMS WARSPITE was used to spot for the guns of that ship, resulting in the destruction of seven German destroyers. (Brown dealt the finishing blow to one of these with a bomb from his aircraft). Shortly afterwards, the same pilot executed the first dive bombing attack by the Fleet Air Arm, resulting in the sinking of a U-boat.


Quote from: PR19_Kit on April 21, 2012, 02:23:33 AM
Presumably we're talking about non-carrier catapults here? The ones fitted to cruisers and battleships etc.



Yes Cruiser / Batleship catapults

rickshaw

I would assume that the Swordfish had a choice - floats or a Torpedo.  I also suspect that the float struts would have impeded carriage of a Torpedo.
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

PR19_Kit

Quote from: rickshaw on April 21, 2012, 05:04:09 AM
I would assume that the Swordfish had a choice - floats or a Torpedo.  I also suspect that the float struts would have impeded carriage of a Torpedo.

Actually they don't.

The floats on a Swordfish don't have inter-float struts, they're strutted diagonally up to the fuselage, presumably just so they could carry torps. Here's a piccie of one in that configuration.

Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

pyro-manic

There's a very simple solution - use the crane that recovers the floatplane back aboard ship in reverse - set it in the water and let it take off normally! The issue is speed, of course - it's not going to be anywhere near as quick as catapult launch - but it would be possible.
Some of my models can be found on my Flickr album >>>HERE<<<

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on April 21, 2012, 08:59:19 AM
Quote from: rickshaw on April 21, 2012, 05:04:09 AM
I would assume that the Swordfish had a choice - floats or a Torpedo.  I also suspect that the float struts would have impeded carriage of a Torpedo.

Actually they don't.

The floats on a Swordfish don't have inter-float struts, they're strutted diagonally up to the fuselage, presumably just so they could carry torps. Here's a piccie of one in that configuration.




So it comes down to, is the catapult strong enough to launch it at that weight.

Putting the aircraft into the water would work.  I wonder, could it be done while the ship is under way?   Picking up could.  I suppose if a quick-release hook was used it would be possible but it might be a bit too much for what were essentially fairly fragile structures, particularly if there is any sea running at the same time.

If the catapult position could be changed to the bows, you could get more lift from over the bow wind as carriers did. 
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Rheged

#12


If the catapult position could be changed to the bows, you could get more lift from over the bow wind as carriers did. 
I now have a surreal picture in my head of a super CAM ship with a RATO assisted Torpedo  Beaufighter ready to go.     AAAAAGH!!!
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

PR19_Kit

Quote from: Rheged on April 22, 2012, 01:23:52 AM
I now have a surreal picture in my head of a super CAM ship with a RATO assisted Torpedo  Beaufighter ready to go.     AAAAAGH!!!

Now you've planted the thought you can bet that just such an model will appear in plastic before the year is out.  ;D :lol: :mellow:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

NARSES2

#14
Tigercat and Kit. Thanks for the info on the Swordfish floatplane  :thumbsup:

I'll have to re-read my books covering the two Narvik battles - been looking at taking the Royal Norwegian Mail ship cruise up the Norwegian coast. Don't think she stops at Narvik though
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.