avatar_Taiidantomcat

Lockheed Martin F-35A, B, C and other ideas

Started by Taiidantomcat, November 27, 2012, 01:52:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mossie

Those bays are going to keep the super detailers very very busy!
I don't think it's nice, you laughin'. You see, my mule don't like people laughin'. He gets the crazy idea you're laughin' at him. Now if you apologize, like I know you're going to, I might convince him that you really didn't mean it.

NARSES2

Quote from: Mossie on June 12, 2013, 03:14:05 AM
Those bays are going to keep the super detailers very very busy!

That was my thought as well plus that Jadam or whatever it is covered in dots looks as though it's smiling  :blink:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

Taiidantomcat



F-35 on a stick! (RCS measurement)



Joint Strike Missiles on the wing
"Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gaultier

"My model is right! It's the real world that's wrong!" -global warming scientist

An armor guy, who builds airplanes almost exclusively, that he converts to space fighters-- all while admiring ship models.

PR19_Kit

Ah yes, why DO they mount RCS models upside-down on that stick thing?
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Steel Penguin

theve already paid a hughe amount of cash for it, and if they don't use it some one else will steal it....
the things you learn, give your mind the wings to fly, and the chains to hold yourself steady
take off and nuke the site form orbit, nope, time for the real thing, CAM and gridfire, call special circumstances. 
wow, its like freefalling into the Geofront
Not a member of the Hufflepuff conspiracy!

rickshaw

Quote from: PR19_Kit on June 15, 2013, 01:28:26 PM
Ah yes, why DO they mount RCS models upside-down on that stick thing?

Puts the "stick" "out of the way" when measuring radar returns when mimicking ground radars.  The emitter is usually at a higher elevation again, off to the left I suspect, out of the frame.   They re-invert it, right-way-up when mimicking air radars.  Thing is, they usually only publish the inverted pictures...
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

NARSES2

Quote from: PR19_Kit on June 15, 2013, 01:28:26 PM
Ah yes, why DO they mount RCS models upside-down on that stick thing?

I wondered that  ;) It's a flipping big stick  :blink:
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.

PR19_Kit

It's the 'upside down' bit that I don't understand...........
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Thorvic

Quote from: PR19_Kit on June 16, 2013, 03:06:15 PM
It's the 'upside down' bit that I don't understand...........

To gauge for ground based and aircraft based radar systems
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

McColm


Thorvic

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/paris-usmc-explores-f-35b-operating-concepts-387420/

Interesting insight into the USMC plans of note are the first unit going to Japan ASAP, the USMC will be testing the MV-22 in the AAR role soon and look to use the MV-22 to support F-35B operations. Finally i can't help thinking the USMC are eyeing up using the HMS Quuen Elizabeth to test out their over sized unit which works well for both parties as the RN get to try the QEC with a two thirds Airgroup at least.
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

rickshaw

That would be rather an interesting experience I suspect for both parties.  There'd be quite a clash of cultures there.  Afterall, HM ships are traditionally "wet" and USMC units are "dry" at sea, for a starters!   The accommodation and messing would be rather interesting as well and all that sort of thing is even before you get to conducting operations!  ;D
How to reduce carbon emissions - Tip #1 - Walk to the Bar for drinks.

Thorvic

Quote from: rickshaw on June 20, 2013, 05:33:51 PM
That would be rather an interesting experience I suspect for both parties.  There'd be quite a clash of cultures there.  Afterall, HM ships are traditionally "wet" and USMC units are "dry" at sea, for a starters!   The accommodation and messing would be rather interesting as well and all that sort of thing is even before you get to conducting operations!  ;D

Well there are a few perks for the USMC but they do deploy quite often onto the RN ships for the experience, plus it works both ways as the RN need to fully test the QEC with a full airgroup (or as near as) to know they can go upto 36 F-35's and we simply wont have the aircraft till 2023.

The MV-22 in the tanker/COD role is interesting, active use as such proven by the USMC will certainly peek UK MOD interest and i can see them considering the Crowsnest fit as a possibility. Unlikely bfore 2020 but may be picked up for study and maybe trials in the 2020 SDSR.
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships

McColm

The USNavy have yet to decide whether replacing their Greyhounds with the Osprey in the C.O.D. role.

Thorvic

Quote from: McColm on June 20, 2013, 11:16:49 PM
The USNavy have yet to decide whether replacing their Greyhounds with the Osprey in the C.O.D. role.

No but the USMC are looking to support their F-35B operations with the MV-22.

The USN MV-22 COD trials are slated for this year, would be interesting if selected as that would help reduce costs and improve reliability of the V-22 program plus as another user in another role it may stoke the intrest of other possible users. Initially i was skeptical about it compared with the Greyhound, but the one stop solution does have merits especially when dealing with other none super-carrier ships in the fleet or going ashore without the need for a full blown Airbase or Airport. We'll just have to wait and see how it does in the USN trials
Project Cancelled SIG Secretary, specialising in post war British RN warships, RN and RAF aircraft projects. Also USN and Russian warships