Duck monoplane & He70, yellow : hybrid aircraft/animals e.a.

Started by ericr, April 21, 2013, 12:04:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

NARSES2

I have memories of being dive bombed by an Airfix Sunderland.

It was one of those kits I had suspended from the ceiling above my bed and the fixings weren't strong enough  :-\ Got no sympathy from my mum at all  :angry: ;)
Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.


ericr


PR19_Kit

Hehehehehe, VERY good indeed!  :thumbsup:

Which loco chassis is it?

It's a 2-8-2, which makes it a Mountain, and the SNCF had some very powerful Mountains in the steam days.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

kerick

That fits so perfectly! Another "Why didn't I think of that!" build!
I wonder how a B-17 would look? Could become another form of whiff, Combining aircraft and railroad equipment.
" Somewhere, between half true, and completely crazy, is a rainbow of nice colours "
Tophe the Wise

McColm


Rheged

A fascinating juxtaposition!!   It's the last thing I'd expected of a BR-41 loco    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRB_Class_41 but it looks absolutely right!!
"If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you....."
It  means that you read  the instruction sheet

PR19_Kit

#3172
Ahah, now I understand what the BR41 meant, thanks.  :thumbsup:

I know NOTHING about German Railways of course, UK and American railways are the limit of my area of expertise, such as it is.

IIRC there was only one British 2-8-2 design actually produced, and that was Gresley's P2 of the 30s. Riddle actually proposed a 2-8-2 freight engine but the 2-10-0 9F was the preferred design. For some reason Mountains were called Mikados in the UK.  :-\
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

ericr


thanks  ;)

the fit, in length as well as in width, went just nearly surprisingly fine indeed

sideshowbob9

Nice! I tried something similar but with a Stirling and some Deltic bits but didn't have your skill to pull it off.  :thumbsup:

Quote from: PR19_Kit on October 16, 2020, 03:33:32 PM
IIRC there was only one British 2-8-2 design actually produced, and that was Gresley's P2 of the 30s. Riddle actually proposed a 2-8-2 freight engine but the 2-10-0 9F was the preferred design.

Gresley also had the P1 produced prior to the P2. Just two built and they were relatively quickly disposed of as if used to anywhere near their full potential, their trains would be too long for the passing loops/sidings. Fowler proposed a 2-8-2 for the LMS in 1926 alongside his Pacific. I can send a pic of the drawing if you are interested? Sorry for the threadjacking!  :angel:

zenrat

A version of this which retained the guns in the nose turret would have been usefull back in my time at Railtrack in order to deal with the line side rabbit infestation problem.
Fred

- Can't be bothered to do the proper research and get it right.

Another ill conceived, lazily thought out, crudely executed and badly painted piece of half arsed what-if modelling muppetry from zenrat industries.

zenrat industries:  We're everywhere...for your convenience..

ericr


NARSES2

Do not condemn the judgement of another because it differs from your own. You may both be wrong.