LCM & sails, red : hybrid aircraft/animals e.a.

Started by ericr, April 21, 2013, 12:04:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tophe

Quote from: PR19_Kit on February 26, 2022, 04:42:06 AM
It looks odd, with something missing, until you realise that it DOESN'T have the turbos and radiators bulging out of the booms.
Uh? British Lockheed Lightnings had no turbo I have heard. Even as 1/72 model:
https://www.1001hobbies.com/aircraft-model-kits/496570-rs-models-rsmi92096-lockheed-lightning-p-322-ii.html
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

PR19_Kit

Indeed they didn't, but there were very few of them only six IIRC.
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit

jcf

Quote from: PR19_Kit on February 26, 2022, 01:18:37 PM
Indeed they didn't, but there were very few of them only six IIRC.

667 were ordered by the Anglo-French Purchasing Commission as the Model 322-61-03 (or 322-F) for France and
322-61-04 (or 322-B) for Britain. All powered by the same , non turbo-supercharged, unhanded V-1710-C15 as
the Curtiss Hawk 81As already on order.

143 were built, three went to the RAF as Lightning I, 140 were retained by the USAAC/USAAF for trainers
with the non-standard designation P-322. Twenty of these kept their original unhanded engines, the others
were converted to use handed V-1710-27 and -29 engines but were not equipped with turbo-superchargers.

http://joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/p38_7.html


USAAF P-322, note the air scoop on top of the nacelle.

Tophe

Thanks for this expert view of Historian. :thumbsup:
Anyway, turbo or not those P-38/322 looked very similar, I prefer ericr's one with tiny engines... :wub:
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

McColm

Quote from: Tophe on February 26, 2022, 07:38:23 AM
Quote from: McColm on February 26, 2022, 05:16:28 AM
Three or four propellers on each engine would work.
Do you mean "blades" of propellers or entire propellers (contra-rotating)? :unsure: <_<
Propeller blades. Noncontra-rotating.

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]




ericr


Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

Tophe

[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

PR19_Kit

Painted in a USAAC NMF scheme that'd pass for some sort of Lockheed crew transport, it looks so 'right'.  :thumbsup:
Kit's Rule 1 ) Any aircraft can be improved by fitting longer wings, and/or a longer fuselage
Kit's Rule 2) The backstory can always be changed to suit the model

...and I'm not a closeted 'Take That' fan, I'm a REAL fan! :)

Regards
Kit