avatar_philp

Whiffs found on Facebook

Started by philp, June 08, 2013, 10:40:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Captain Canada

That is slick ! Sure looks fast and I imagine it would sound amazing !

:thumbsup:
CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

TheChronicOne

Quote from: loupgarou on May 12, 2017, 06:31:01 AM
Quote from: NARSES2 on May 12, 2017, 05:50:29 AM
Quote from: zenrat on May 12, 2017, 02:31:57 AM
That's a gorgeous paintjob.

Absolutely  :thumbsup: I'd say it was stupendous but there's something about the prop's that doesn't sit right with me for some reason ?

Yes, the same impression I had. It looks like the left fuselage (the one with the cockpit) propeller has the blades leading edge backward. (I don't know how to explain better, sorry )
Could it be (the differening prop angles)  because they spin in different directions?  (wild guess)
-Sprues McDuck-

CammNut

The twin-fuselage racing design was the Scaled Composites Pond Racer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites_Pond_Racer

Tophe

Quote from: CammNut on May 12, 2017, 12:43:44 PM
The twin-fuselage racing design was the Scaled Composites Pond Racer:
In the what-if world, there were many other ones ;)
[the word "realistic" hurts my heart...]

James W.

Quote from: TheChronicOne on May 12, 2017, 07:49:10 AM
Quote from: loupgarou on May 12, 2017, 06:31:01 AM
Quote from: NARSES2 on May 12, 2017, 05:50:29 AM
Quote from: zenrat on May 12, 2017, 02:31:57 AM
That's a gorgeous paintjob.

Absolutely  :thumbsup: I'd say it was stupendous but there's something about the prop's that doesn't sit right with me for some reason ?

Yes, the same impression I had. It looks like the left fuselage (the one with the cockpit) propeller has the blades leading edge backward. (I don't know how to explain better, sorry )
Could it be (the differening prop angles)  because they spin in different directions?  (wild guess)

Good guess! Correct!

& oddly enough, the opposite rotation set-up to the DH Hornet, even though the P-82 & Hornet used nearly identical R-R Merlin mills..

kitnut617

Quote from: James W. on May 12, 2017, 08:59:39 PM
Quote from: TheChronicOne on May 12, 2017, 07:49:10 AM
Quote from: loupgarou on May 12, 2017, 06:31:01 AM
Quote from: NARSES2 on May 12, 2017, 05:50:29 AM
Quote from: zenrat on May 12, 2017, 02:31:57 AM
That's a gorgeous paintjob.

Absolutely  :thumbsup: I'd say it was stupendous but there's something about the prop's that doesn't sit right with me for some reason ?

Yes, the same impression I had. It looks like the left fuselage (the one with the cockpit) propeller has the blades leading edge backward. (I don't know how to explain better, sorry )
Could it be (the differening prop angles)  because they spin in different directions?  (wild guess)

Good guess! Correct!

& oddly enough, the opposite rotation set-up to the DH Hornet, even though the P-82 & Hornet used nearly identical R-R Merlin mills..

Actually, it's set up just the same way as a DH Hornet and the XP-82, P-82B.C &D used a Packard Merlin which was so different in it's construction nothing was inter-changeable with it's RR counterpart
If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

James W.

#876
Ah, no.. the Packard built Merlin varied only in detail differences such as fastener threads & whatnot,
plus a few bolt on items like supercharger drive gear & carburetor, with provision for ADI, in late units,
- otherwise they pretty-well mirrored the R-R units.

The P-82 & DH Hornet both used the most highly developed service Merlin types, with one of each engine pair
rotating in opposite direction, much as the P-38 had long utilized*, but ironically due to aerodynamic issues,
both P-82 & Hornet had to swap over engines from left to right, compared original set-up..

See Hornet: https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1947/1947%20-%200004.html



* Albeit the Allison mill had, due to its design parameters as an airship engine, an in-built facility for opposite crank rotation,
whereas the Merlin used an extra gear set in its PTO/reduction gear train, & retained the crank rotation.

Edit: added reference citation link.

kitnut617

If I'm not building models, I'm out riding my dirtbike

TheChronicOne

I've actually had this in my FB photos for about 5 years. It popped up again today and I realized, "hey, it's a whif!"

I don't know the artist, however... but.... anyway...   "Grammar Nazi:"

:o ;D


-Sprues McDuck-

Captain Canada

CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

dumaniac

That design with the jets embedded in the wing was part of the early designs of the 262.  The meteor used that design was we all know.  That version of the 262 is on my "to-do" list

Captain Canada

CANADA KICKS arse !!!!

Long Live the Commonwealth !!!
Vive les Canadiens !
Where's my beer ?

reddfoxx

Love the Vigilante in that scheme.

Dizzyfugu

That looks almost photoshopped to me.  :o

But there were actually USN Vigilantes with (experimental) upper surface camouflage during the Vietnam era, like this one here:





These machine had standard light gull grey/white liveries, just the upper surfaces were painted over. Here's another one in SEA colors:



Other types (A-4s, A-6s, A-1s and, AFAIK, F-4s, too) were tested, too, but the practice did not catch on.

Rick Lowe

Probably because they looked too much like Air Force birds...
The Navy has to be a bit different...  :lol: